I do think that the srfi 251 semantic is more consistent with the
Scheme spirit, in the sense of the definitions being "simultaneous".

In fact, I was very surprised to see 245 being proposed.

On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 at 17:54, Daphne Preston-Kendal <xxxxxx@nonceword.org> wrote:
>
> On 2 Dec 2023, at 02:54, Per Bothner <xxxxxx@bothner.com> wrote:
>
> > Also consider:
> >
> > (let ((x 10))
> >  (display "the result is: ")
> >  (display x)
> >  (define x 42))
> >  (newline))
> >
> > I believe the result here should be undefined - but *not* 10.
>
> Indeed, this is An Error in SRFI 245.
>
>
> Daphne
>

--
Yours sincerely, Vladimir Nikishkin
(Sent from GMail web interface.)