|
Suggestion: ephemeron-case
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(04 Feb 2025 10:08 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Suggestion: ephemeron-case
John Cowan
(04 Feb 2025 11:35 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Suggestion: ephemeron-case
Vincent Manis (he/him)
(04 Feb 2025 19:38 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Suggestion: ephemeron-case
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(05 Feb 2025 15:12 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Suggestion: ephemeron-case
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(05 Feb 2025 15:30 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Suggestion: ephemeron-case
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(05 Feb 2025 18:04 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Suggestion: ephemeron-case
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(05 Feb 2025 18:16 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Fwd: Suggestion: ephemeron-case
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(16 Mar 2025 13:19 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Suggestion: ephemeron-case
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(12 May 2025 11:51 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Suggestion: ephemeron-case
Arthur A. Gleckler
(10 Jun 2025 23:16 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Suggestion: ephemeron-case
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(03 Aug 2025 09:38 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Suggestion: ephemeron-case
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(03 Aug 2025 15:29 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Suggestion: ephemeron-case
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(03 Aug 2025 15:30 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Suggestion: ephemeron-case
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(09 Oct 2025 12:34 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Suggestion: ephemeron-case
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Oct 2025 13:24 UTC)
|
||
|
Usefulness of reference-barrier
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(12 Oct 2025 20:16 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Usefulness of reference-barrier
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(13 Oct 2025 05:58 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Usefulness of reference-barrier
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(13 Oct 2025 07:21 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Usefulness of reference-barrier
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(13 Oct 2025 11:17 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Usefulness of reference-barrier
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(22 Oct 2025 07:18 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Usefulness of reference-barrier
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(30 Oct 2025 22:46 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Usefulness of reference-barrier
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Oct 2025 07:50 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Usefulness of reference-barrier
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(30 Oct 2025 23:03 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Usefulness of reference-barrier
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(31 Oct 2025 08:02 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Usefulness of reference-barrier Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (04 Nov 2025 18:57 UTC)
|
||
Am So., 12. Okt. 2025 um 22:16 Uhr schrieb Daphne Preston-Kendal <xxxxxx@nonceword.org>: > Chez Scheme added keep-live in version 10, but it had ephemerons and other weak references long before. Its documentation suggests the purpose of keep-live is related to the ‘immobile objects’ feature, not to the re-ordering optimization you are concerned about. One more note about that: Racket uses "keep-live" in its implementation of ephemerons for exactly the same purpose as "reference-barrier" is in this SRFI. It is a wrong belief that the purpose of "keep-live" is only related to the "immobile objects" feature. (Many of the recent additions to the Chez Scheme programming language have their origins in the demands of Racket CS, so CS code used by Racket matters.)
