On 3/10/26 00:18, Peter McGoron wrote:
> One more style note: I think it would be useful to have a summary of
> the identifiers exported by the (SRFI 263) library, because many of
> the things defined by the SRFI are messages it can be a little
> difficult to see which is which at first glance.
>
> -- Peter McGoron

Is there precedent for this in another SRFI? For now, I added a separate
heading with an unordered list at the beginning of each library section.

Best regards,
Daniel Ziltener