Re: Request for review Daniel Ziltener 15 Mar 2026 23:30 UTC

Yes, I'll go with `derive`. I have also added a `copy` message that
copies the list of messages/slots, but allows implementations to
properly deep-copy contents of the slots if feasible.

On 3/14/26 08:54, jobol wrote:
> Le Fri, 13 Mar 2026 23:43:17 +0100,
> Daniel Ziltener <xxxxxx@lyrion.ch> a écrit :
>
>> Other names we came up with after a short brainstorming on #chicken
>> that I'd like to suggest:
>>
>> - induce
>> - derive
>> - metastasize
>>
>> I think `derive` would be my favourite. Sounds technical enough to be
>> taken seriously, and is quite precise in its meaning.
>>
> I like 'derive'. +1