|
SRFI 231 and empty arrays
Bradley J Lucier
(31 Mar 2026 16:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays
Bradley J Lucier
(01 Apr 2026 17:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays
John Cowan
(01 Apr 2026 21:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays John Cowan (01 Apr 2026 21:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays
Bradley J Lucier
(01 Apr 2026 22:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays
Per Bothner
(01 Apr 2026 22:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays
John Cowan
(01 Apr 2026 23:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays
Bradley Lucier
(01 Apr 2026 23:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays
John Cowan
(02 Apr 2026 00:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays
John Cowan
(01 Apr 2026 23:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays
Arthur A. Gleckler
(01 Apr 2026 17:57 UTC)
|
Update: The CL description of #A says "If some dimension of the array whose representation is being parsed is found to be 0, all dimensions to the right (i.e., the higher numbered dimensions) are also considered to be 0." On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 5:30 PM John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> wrote: > > CL (where all lower bounds are 0) doesn't round-trip empty arrays > either. Arrays with dimensions (0 0) and (0 2) both print as #2A(), > which is read back with dimensions (0 0). However, an array with > dimensions (2 0) prints as #2A(() ()) > > The element type is also discarded on output: if you read them in, you > always get an array with the generic storage class. SBCL has an > extension for this. > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 1:50 PM Bradley J Lucier <xxxxxx@purdue.edu> wrote: > > > > On Mar 31, 2026, at 12:08 PM, Bradley J Lucier <xxxxxx@purdue.edu> wrote: > > > > In your notation, how would you specify an empty array literal with lower bounds ‘#(0 0) and upper bounds ‘#(0 2)? > > > > > > After more study, I’ll say that I don’t think one can specify an empty array literal with lower bounds ‘#(0 0) and upper bounds ‘#(0 2) using SRFI 268. > > > > Brad