SRFI 231 and empty arrays Bradley J Lucier (31 Mar 2026 16:08 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays Bradley J Lucier (01 Apr 2026 17:50 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays John Cowan (01 Apr 2026 21:30 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays John Cowan (01 Apr 2026 21:47 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays Bradley J Lucier (01 Apr 2026 22:21 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays Per Bothner (01 Apr 2026 22:44 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays John Cowan (01 Apr 2026 23:30 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays Bradley Lucier (01 Apr 2026 23:43 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays John Cowan (02 Apr 2026 00:36 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays John Cowan (01 Apr 2026 23:04 UTC)
Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays Arthur A. Gleckler (01 Apr 2026 17:57 UTC)

Re: SRFI 231 and empty arrays John Cowan 01 Apr 2026 23:04 UTC

On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 6:20 PM Bradley J Lucier <xxxxxx@purdue.edu> wrote:

> Do you want SRFI 268 notation to be able to specify all literal array constants?

There are many arrays that cannot be round-tripped in any case:: in
particular, arrays with user-written storage classes as well as all
generalized arrays will not read back as they were written out.
Zero-element arrays are just another special case that won't
round-trip.