|
Some initial comments
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(04 Apr 2026 10:01 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(07 Apr 2026 11:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(29 Jul 2026 20:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments Vincent Manis (he/him) (29 Jul 2026 21:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(01 Aug 2026 16:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(13 Aug 2026 06:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(13 Aug 2026 06:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(19 Aug 2026 06:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(02 Sep 2026 12:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(07 Sep 2026 08:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(09 Sep 2026 11:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(20 Sep 2026 08:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(20 Sep 2026 19:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(21 Sep 2026 07:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(21 Sep 2026 18:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(28 Sep 2026 05:08 UTC)
|
On 2026-07-29 13:16, Daphne Preston-Kendal wrote: > In R7RS there is no way to set the value of a parameter object apart from its default value (given at make-parameter time) and local rebinding with parameterize. Either set-current-test-runner! cannot exist, or current-test-runner is not a parameter object. I have no opinion on the advisability of set-current-test-runner! one way or the other, but I will note that Chez Scheme parameters are mutable, unlike their SRFI 39 counterparts. I haven't done a survey of other implementations. But rather than create some other ad hoc facility, I would rather permit mutable parameters. I don't feel strongly on this, but it is an alternative. -- vincent