|
Some initial comments
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(04 Apr 2026 10:01 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(07 Apr 2026 11:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(29 Jul 2026 20:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Vincent Manis (he/him)
(29 Jul 2026 21:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(01 Aug 2026 16:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(13 Aug 2026 06:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(13 Aug 2026 06:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(19 Aug 2026 06:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(02 Sep 2026 12:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(07 Sep 2026 08:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(09 Sep 2026 11:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(20 Sep 2026 08:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(20 Sep 2026 19:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(21 Sep 2026 07:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments Daphne Preston-Kendal (21 Sep 2026 18:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: Some initial comments
Andrew Tropin
(28 Sep 2026 05:08 UTC)
|
On 21 Sep 2026, at 09:10, Andrew Tropin <xxxxxx@trop.in> wrote: > Have a few more questions. > > (let ((metadata identity)) > (test "my test" () > (metadata '((default . meta))) > > (is #t))) > > will silently "remove" metadata from test. Is it expected behavior for > scheme macro? Yes. > Do we need to warn user of the macro somehow if they do > it? No. > Could you share some examples of similar macros in the wild? They can > help me to better understand how idiomatic scheme macros look like. > Previously I thought that `(guix records)` were idiomatic, but it seems > they are not. The standard Scheme ‘cond’ and ‘case’ syntaxes work like this (the ‘else’ and ‘=>’ auxiliary syntax keywords), as do the auxiliary syntax keywords of R6RS define-record-type <https://r6rs.org/corrected/html/r6rs-lib/r6rs-lib-Z-H-7.html#node_sec_6.2>. Daphne