|
more comments
Peter McGoron
(17 May 2026 04:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(17 May 2026 20:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Peter McGoron
(17 May 2026 21:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(18 May 2026 00:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Shiro Kawai
(18 May 2026 11:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
John Cowan
(18 May 2026 13:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Shiro Kawai
(18 May 2026 17:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(18 May 2026 18:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Peter McGoron
(18 May 2026 15:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments Vincent Manis (he/him) (18 May 2026 16:41 UTC)
|
|
Special initialization behavior for the default determinized library (was: more comments)
Peter McGoron
(18 May 2026 21:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: Special initialization behavior for the default determinized library (was: more comments)
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(18 May 2026 23:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: Special initialization behavior for the default determinized library (was: more comments)
John Cowan
(19 May 2026 01:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: Special initialization behavior for the default determinized library (was: more comments)
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(19 May 2026 17:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Shiro Kawai
(18 May 2026 17:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Peter McGoron
(18 May 2026 18:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Shiro Kawai
(18 May 2026 18:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Peter McGoron
(19 May 2026 02:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Shiro Kawai
(19 May 2026 03:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(18 May 2026 16:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Shiro Kawai
(18 May 2026 17:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
John Cowan
(18 May 2026 06:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Peter McGoron
(18 May 2026 11:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
John Cowan
(18 May 2026 13:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: more comments
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
(18 May 2026 17:19 UTC)
|
On 2026-05-18 08:32, Peter McGoron wrote: > Perhaps the specification can be extended such that if `#t` is passed > as an initializer, then the random port is initialized to a fixed > default state. > > -- Peter McGoron > I'm still coming at this from a teaching viewpoint. The #t suggestion is great, but if I were teaching with this, I'd want to show that different seeds produce different random sequences. So I'd like to extend this slightly so that any integer can be used (as well as #t), with the requirement that each integer leads to an initial state (presumably different, but that's not guaranteed). -- vincent