On 2026-05-18 07:20 -1000, Shiro Kawai wrote: > Suppose I'm bisecting commits to find the cause of a particular test > failure that uses a randomized sequence. When should the test code save > this persistent "seed"? This is a tricky problem which we should try to solve, since it's an important use case for seedable random ports. At the moment I see two possibilities: 1. Prior to all of your test runs you create a dummy port, extract its state, and write it to a file in a safe location. Every random port you create when testing reads its initial state from this file. When the test runs are finished, the file can be removed or saved for later use (i.e. if that particular state revealed new bugs). (This is John's suggestion, if I've understood his response correctly.) 2. Initialize all of your random ports with an infinite binary port that produces a constant sequence. "All zeros" is of course bad, but you could probably get away with "all fours". This is a lot more fragile than (1). I'm not entirely happy with either of these options. -- Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>
