Re: SRFI 284: define-typed Artyom Bologov 28 Sep 2026 14:38 UTC

Arne,

> Or would a pure extension SRFI be better, so that if people get the
> second SRFI they always get both styles?
>
> That way we’d always only have to import a single SRFI, never two, to
> support both styles.

That’s what I did with SRFI 273 at least,
importing 253 to do the heavy lifting.

Thanks,
--
Artyom