Finally clauses Tony Garnock-Jones (09 Aug 2002 14:05 UTC)
|
Re: Finally clauses
Dave Mason
(09 Aug 2002 14:58 UTC)
|
Re: Finally clauses
Richard Kelsey
(09 Aug 2002 23:28 UTC)
|
Re: Finally clauses
Tony Garnock-Jones
(12 Aug 2002 11:24 UTC)
|
Re: Finally clauses
Richard Kelsey
(13 Aug 2002 00:48 UTC)
|
Re: Finally clauses
Tony Garnock-Jones
(13 Aug 2002 17:35 UTC)
|
Re: Finally clauses
Richard Kelsey
(15 Aug 2002 01:47 UTC)
|
Re: Finally clauses
Tony Garnock-Jones
(15 Aug 2002 11:11 UTC)
|
Re: Finally clauses
bear
(15 Aug 2002 15:19 UTC)
|
Re: Finally clauses
sperber@xxxxxx
(29 Aug 2002 08:08 UTC)
|
Re: Finally clauses
bear
(01 Sep 2002 20:55 UTC)
|
Re: Finally clauses
Richard Kelsey
(01 Sep 2002 22:22 UTC)
|
Re: Finally clauses
bear
(04 Sep 2002 03:07 UTC)
|
Re: Finally clauses
Richard Kelsey
(04 Sep 2002 06:55 UTC)
|
Hi. One feature I find valuable in Java that I miss in C++ (and Scheme, for that matter) is the idea of a "finally" clause. Would srfi-34 be a sensible place to put one of these - either alongside the try clause, on its own, or bound up together with it, as perhaps try/finally? (begin (mutex-lock! m) (finally (mutex-unlock! m) (do-operation-requiring-lock))) Tony