Re: Stream-filter and space leaks

Stream-filter and space leaks Phil Bewig (20 Feb 2003 14:08 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks Richard Kelsey (20 Feb 2003 18:41 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks Phil Bewig (21 Feb 2003 09:57 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks Richard Kelsey (21 Feb 2003 23:18 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks sperber@xxxxxx (21 Feb 2003 10:04 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks Richard Kelsey (21 Feb 2003 15:06 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks Matthias Neubauer (25 Feb 2003 16:01 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks Richard Kelsey (25 Feb 2003 18:25 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks Matthias Neubauer (25 Feb 2003 21:32 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks Richard Kelsey (25 Feb 2003 22:11 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks sperber@xxxxxx (26 Feb 2003 08:18 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks Matthias Neubauer (26 Feb 2003 13:31 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks sperber@xxxxxx (11 Mar 2003 14:58 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks Matthias Neubauer (19 Mar 2003 15:27 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks felix (22 Mar 2003 09:49 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks felix (22 Mar 2003 09:56 UTC)

Re: Stream-filter and space leaks felix 22 Mar 2003 09:37 UTC

felix wrote:
> Matthias Neubauer wrote:
>
>>
>> Just for kicks, I just tested some Scheme implementations I had access
>> to to see how they'd behave in this respect. I tried
>>
>> scsh 0.6.4 (Beta 1) | Scheme 48 0.57 | petite scheme 6.0a | MzScheme3m
>> 203.6 | Larceny v1.0a1
>>
>> Always in this very order, always without any special runtime
>> options. "ok" means that an example leads to a true endless loop,
>> "leaks" means that the system aborts after a while.
>>
>
> For the sake of completeness: Chicken and Gambit pass all tests.
>

For even more completeness: stalin passes none.

cheers,
felix