Stream-filter and space leaks
Phil Bewig
(20 Feb 2003 14:08 UTC)
|
Re: Stream-filter and space leaks
Richard Kelsey
(20 Feb 2003 18:41 UTC)
|
Re: Stream-filter and space leaks
Phil Bewig
(21 Feb 2003 09:57 UTC)
|
Re: Stream-filter and space leaks
Richard Kelsey
(21 Feb 2003 23:18 UTC)
|
Re: Stream-filter and space leaks
sperber@xxxxxx
(21 Feb 2003 10:04 UTC)
|
Re: Stream-filter and space leaks
Richard Kelsey
(21 Feb 2003 15:06 UTC)
|
Re: Stream-filter and space leaks
Matthias Neubauer
(25 Feb 2003 16:01 UTC)
|
Re: Stream-filter and space leaks
Richard Kelsey
(25 Feb 2003 18:25 UTC)
|
Re: Stream-filter and space leaks
Matthias Neubauer
(25 Feb 2003 21:32 UTC)
|
Re: Stream-filter and space leaks
Richard Kelsey
(25 Feb 2003 22:11 UTC)
|
Re: Stream-filter and space leaks
sperber@xxxxxx
(26 Feb 2003 08:18 UTC)
|
Re: Stream-filter and space leaks
Matthias Neubauer
(26 Feb 2003 13:31 UTC)
|
Re: Stream-filter and space leaks
sperber@xxxxxx
(11 Mar 2003 14:58 UTC)
|
Re: Stream-filter and space leaks
Matthias Neubauer
(19 Mar 2003 15:27 UTC)
|
Re: Stream-filter and space leaks
felix
(22 Mar 2003 09:49 UTC)
|
Re: Stream-filter and space leaks felix (22 Mar 2003 09:56 UTC)
|
felix wrote: > Matthias Neubauer wrote: > >> >> Just for kicks, I just tested some Scheme implementations I had access >> to to see how they'd behave in this respect. I tried >> >> scsh 0.6.4 (Beta 1) | Scheme 48 0.57 | petite scheme 6.0a | MzScheme3m >> 203.6 | Larceny v1.0a1 >> >> Always in this very order, always without any special runtime >> options. "ok" means that an example leads to a true endless loop, >> "leaks" means that the system aborts after a while. >> > > For the sake of completeness: Chicken and Gambit pass all tests. > For even more completeness: stalin passes none. cheers, felix