On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:48:34AM -0800, bear wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 xxxxxx@freenetproject.org wrote:
>
> >I'd like to know what beyond lacking collection specific shortcut
> >functions is inefficient in the current SRFI.
>
> You're joking, right?  Without the "shortcut functions" as you call them
> being more efficient, there is no reason for most of these collections to
> exist at all.

But they cannot be defined if they don't apply to the general class of
collections.  They need to be defined for those concrete classes or a
more specific general one (like ordered tree).

	Scott