Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries]

Show/hide message thread

[oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 01:28 UTC)

Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 04:25 UTC)

Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 04:54 UTC)

Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 05:33 UTC)

Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 14:10 UTC)

Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 15:11 UTC)

Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 18:01 UTC)

Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 18:29 UTC)

Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 19:05 UTC)

Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] scgmille@xxxxxx (28 Oct 2003 19:42 UTC)

Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] Bradd W. Szonye (28 Oct 2003 19:59 UTC)

Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] Tom Lord (28 Oct 2003 19:59 UTC)

Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] Tom Lord (28 Oct 2003 20:02 UTC)

Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] bear (28 Oct 2003 17:05 UTC)

Re: [oleg@pobox.com: Interface view of dictionaries] scgmille@xxxxxx 28 Oct 2003 15:11 UTC

Show/hide attachments

>
> There is no OO principle behind the classes.  There is a metaphor of
> subtyping which serves to eluminate collection interaction and
> interoperability relationships.

illuminate rather.