floating point and other comments
Alex Shinn
(18 Dec 2003 02:58 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Ken Dickey
(18 Dec 2003 16:17 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Alex Shinn
(19 Dec 2003 01:55 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Ken Dickey
(20 Dec 2003 02:34 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Alex Shinn
(20 Dec 2003 08:56 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
bear
(20 Dec 2003 19:00 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments Alex Shinn (22 Dec 2003 02:16 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
bear
(23 Dec 2003 02:01 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Alex Shinn
(23 Dec 2003 04:38 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Ken Dickey
(22 Dec 2003 02:56 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Per Bothner
(20 Dec 2003 18:05 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Ken Dickey
(22 Dec 2003 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Alex Shinn
(22 Dec 2003 03:50 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Ken Dickey
(22 Dec 2003 17:05 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Alex Shinn
(23 Dec 2003 05:23 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Alex Shinn
(23 Dec 2003 05:26 UTC)
|
At Sat, 20 Dec 2003 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), bear wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Alex Shinn wrote: > > >On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 06:13:27PM +0100, Ken Dickey wrote: > > > >> I will be happy to work with you on an "advanced format" spec which > >> includes this if you would like. > > > >OK, but my personal format just took a turn for the weird and there > >are some issues I want to work out first. And if we ever want to get > >"complete CL format" we'll need a circular-write SRFI and a > >pretty-print SRFI. > > We've already got a circular-write SRFI (srfi-38). I *really* need to pay more attention to the SRFI process... I just spent yesterday writing a circular-write SRFI and reference implementation... and I now realize I disagree with the API provided by SRFI-38 :( -- Alex