floating point and other comments
Alex Shinn
(18 Dec 2003 02:58 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Ken Dickey
(18 Dec 2003 16:17 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Alex Shinn
(19 Dec 2003 01:55 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Ken Dickey
(20 Dec 2003 02:34 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Alex Shinn
(20 Dec 2003 08:56 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
bear
(20 Dec 2003 19:00 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Alex Shinn
(22 Dec 2003 02:16 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
bear
(23 Dec 2003 02:01 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Alex Shinn
(23 Dec 2003 04:38 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Ken Dickey
(22 Dec 2003 02:56 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Per Bothner
(20 Dec 2003 18:05 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Ken Dickey
(22 Dec 2003 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments Alex Shinn (22 Dec 2003 03:50 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Ken Dickey
(22 Dec 2003 17:05 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Alex Shinn
(23 Dec 2003 05:23 UTC)
|
Re: floating point and other comments
Alex Shinn
(23 Dec 2003 05:26 UTC)
|
At Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:45:37 +0100, Ken Dickey wrote: > > [3] The complied reference implementation is compact: > mit-scheme format.com 8864 bytes -- bytecode > gambit format.so 16448 bytes -- cross-compiled to C > > I have not done the work, but it I would guess that supporting ~w,dF would at > least double the size of the reference implementation. Attached is a modification to the reference implementation that adds support for ~w,dF (and thus also lays the groundwork for other format chars to take parameters) and incurs less than 50% increase in size (inlining some SRFI-13 procedures and not particularly optimizing for size): mit-scheme format.com 12336 bytes -- bytecode It also modifies ~A to properly detect newlines for cooperation with ~&. -- Alex