Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(11 Oct 2017 19:42 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(11 Oct 2017 19:46 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Donald Allen (11 Oct 2017 20:36 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(11 Oct 2017 21:33 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(12 Oct 2017 13:04 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(12 Oct 2017 19:07 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(12 Oct 2017 19:42 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Shiro Kawai
(12 Oct 2017 20:40 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(12 Oct 2017 23:13 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(13 Oct 2017 02:09 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(13 Oct 2017 15:58 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(13 Oct 2017 16:13 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Marc Feeley
(13 Oct 2017 17:50 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(13 Oct 2017 17:52 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Shiro Kawai
(13 Oct 2017 19:54 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
John Cowan
(13 Oct 2017 17:34 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(13 Oct 2017 17:51 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Alex Shinn
(14 Oct 2017 13:03 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 Oct 2017 13:11 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(18 Oct 2017 18:20 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(18 Oct 2017 19:11 UTC)
|
On 11 October 2017 at 15:45, Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote: > Thank you very much for the bug report. Would you mind narrowing it down to > the simplest reproducible case you can? Maybe this will help: 5> (format "~7,2F" .997554209949891) *** ERROR IN compose-with-digits, "srfi-48.scm"@86.46 -- (Argument 2) NUMBER expected (+ 1 #f) 6> (format "~7,2F" .99755) *** ERROR IN compose-with-digits, "srfi-48.scm"@86.46 -- (Argument 2) NUMBER expected (+ 1 #f) 7> (format "~7,2F" .9975) *** ERROR IN compose-with-digits, "srfi-48.scm"@86.46 -- (Argument 2) NUMBER expected (+ 1 #f) 8> (format "~7,2F" .997) *** ERROR IN compose-with-digits, "srfi-48.scm"@86.46 -- (Argument 2) NUMBER expected (+ 1 #f) 9> (format "~7,2F" .99) " .99" 9>