Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(11 Oct 2017 19:42 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(11 Oct 2017 19:46 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(11 Oct 2017 20:36 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(11 Oct 2017 21:33 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(12 Oct 2017 13:04 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(12 Oct 2017 19:07 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(12 Oct 2017 19:42 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Shiro Kawai
(12 Oct 2017 20:40 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(12 Oct 2017 23:13 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(13 Oct 2017 02:09 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(13 Oct 2017 15:58 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48? Donald Allen (13 Oct 2017 16:13 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Marc Feeley
(13 Oct 2017 17:50 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(13 Oct 2017 17:52 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Shiro Kawai
(13 Oct 2017 19:54 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
John Cowan
(13 Oct 2017 17:34 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(13 Oct 2017 17:51 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Alex Shinn
(14 Oct 2017 13:03 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 Oct 2017 13:11 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(18 Oct 2017 18:20 UTC)
|
Re: Bug in srfi-48?
Donald Allen
(18 Oct 2017 19:11 UTC)
|
Here's another: > (load "srfi-48.scm") "/home/dca/Software/newcash/gLibraries/srfi-48/srfi-48.scm" > (format "~8,0F" -14.99995999999362) " -13." > (round -14.99995999999362) -15. > The version of srfi-48.scm I am using has both of yesterday's patches installed. I saw the symptoms of the above before installing these patches, so I don't think they are the cause of this error. On 13 October 2017 at 11:58, Donald Allen <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: > The patches offered thus far seem to have addressed the problems I > previously reported. But here's another: > > 1> (format "~7,2F" 18.0000000000008) > " 18.0." > 1> > > And I am seeing symptoms in my application that other numbers are not > being displayed correctly. I have not chased them down yet, but will > try to do so and report if I find anything. > > I must say that it's disconcerting to be finding all these problems in > code that was finalized in 2004. I think at the very least, a warning > should be posted in an appropriate place that issues have been found > with this srfi, efforts are being made to correct them, and until > further notice, its use may not produce correct results. > > /Don > > On 12 October 2017 at 22:09, Donald Allen <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 12 October 2017 at 19:13, Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Donald Allen <xxxxxx@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Sorry, I wasn't clear. I was talking about this: >>> >>> >>> I apologize. That should have been obvious to me. I've been trying to do >>> too many things at once over the past few days. >>> >>> Would you mind trying Shiro Kawai's patch? >> >> I applied both yours and Shiro Kawai"s patches: >> >> 1> (format "~a & ~7,2F\\%\\\\\n" "Framingham Mass Muni Purpose Loan" >> 1.997554209949891) >> "Framingham Mass Muni Purpose Loan & 2.00\\%\\\\\n" >> 1> (format "~a & ~7,2F\\%\\\\\n" "Framingham Mass Muni Purpose Loan" >> .997554209949891) >> "Framingham Mass Muni Purpose Loan & 1.00\\%\\\\\n" >> 1> (format "~7,2F" .997554209949891) >> " 1.00" >> 1> (format "~7,2F" .99755420) >> " 1.00" >> 1> (format "~7,2F" .99755) >> " 1.00" >> 1> (format "~7,2F" .997) >> " 1.00" >> 1> (format "~7,2F" .99) >> " .99" >> 1> >> >> Looks good. Thanks very much. >> >> /Don >> >>> >>> (Thank you, Mr. Kawai.)