On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:14:57 -0500, Richard Kelsey <xxxxxx@s48.org> wrote:

> (C) Withdraw SRFI-50 from consideration until after there
> is separate SRFI describing a more general and more
> portable FFI (D) Withdraw SRFI-50 permanently

> [...]

>
> So what I want to know, in an attempt to locate some consensus,
> is whether the folks that have been objecting to SRFI-50 in
> its current form would be happy (or at least significantly less
> unhappy) with (C).

yup.

cheers,
felix