home
products
support
blog
about
login
Group Email Manager
login
signup
Email list hosting service & mailing list manager
home
products
support
blog
about
login
Home
srfi-50@srfi.schemers.org
Archive index January 2004
Thread Index - January 2004 - srfi-50@srfi.schemers.org
Search:
Search
« December
Archive index
By date
Refresh
Febuary »
null-terminated strings vs. strings with length
Sebastian Egner
(01 Jan 2004 15:04 UTC)
Re: null-terminated strings vs. strings with length
Richard Kelsey
(05 Jan 2004 12:27 UTC)
(Previous discussion continued)
Re: Strings/chars
Jim Blandy
(08 Jan 2004 08:09 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars
Shiro Kawai
(08 Jan 2004 09:45 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars
Jim Blandy
(08 Jan 2004 19:46 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars
Shiro Kawai
(08 Jan 2004 21:59 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars
tb@xxxxxx
(08 Jan 2004 22:16 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars
Jim Blandy
(08 Jan 2004 23:04 UTC)
Re: Strings/chars
tb@xxxxxx
(08 Jan 2004 23:28 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Michael Sperber
(03 Jan 2004 16:12 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
bear
(03 Jan 2004 19:42 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Michael Sperber
(03 Jan 2004 19:54 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
felix
(04 Jan 2004 18:53 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Tom Lord
(04 Jan 2004 22:39 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Michael Sperber
(05 Jan 2004 19:17 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Tom Lord
(05 Jan 2004 22:19 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Michael Sperber
(06 Jan 2004 20:36 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Michael Sperber
(05 Jan 2004 19:19 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Jim Blandy
(08 Jan 2004 08:25 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
bear
(08 Jan 2004 16:56 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Jim Blandy
(08 Jan 2004 19:51 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Tom Lord
(08 Jan 2004 21:01 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
tb@xxxxxx
(08 Jan 2004 22:08 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
bear
(09 Jan 2004 05:06 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Bradd W. Szonye
(09 Jan 2004 18:08 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
bear
(10 Jan 2004 00:01 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Michael Sperber
(17 Jan 2004 15:58 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
bear
(18 Jan 2004 05:58 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Michael Sperber
(18 Jan 2004 10:18 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Tom Lord
(18 Jan 2004 16:21 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
bear
(18 Jan 2004 21:09 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Tom Lord
(18 Jan 2004 21:53 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
bear
(19 Jan 2004 01:28 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
Tom Lord
(19 Jan 2004 02:59 UTC)
Re: Couple things...
felix
(04 Jan 2004 18:45 UTC)
(Previous discussion continued)
Re: non-local exits are icky
Michael Sperber
(03 Jan 2004 16:16 UTC)
Re: non-local exits are icky
Tom Lord
(04 Jan 2004 01:19 UTC)
(Previous discussion continued)
Re: no constants please
Tom Lord
(04 Jan 2004 01:16 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Richard Kelsey
(04 Jan 2004 18:09 UTC)
Re: no constants please
felix
(04 Jan 2004 19:28 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Richard Kelsey
(04 Jan 2004 20:06 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Tom Lord
(04 Jan 2004 21:39 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Tom Lord
(04 Jan 2004 22:09 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Richard Kelsey
(04 Jan 2004 22:58 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Tom Lord
(05 Jan 2004 01:16 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Tom Lord
(05 Jan 2004 01:45 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Richard Kelsey
(05 Jan 2004 11:40 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Tom Lord
(05 Jan 2004 16:51 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Richard Kelsey
(05 Jan 2004 17:48 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Tom Lord
(05 Jan 2004 18:50 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Michael Sperber
(05 Jan 2004 18:48 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Tom Lord
(05 Jan 2004 22:26 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Michael Sperber
(06 Jan 2004 07:42 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Tom Lord
(06 Jan 2004 17:25 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Michael Sperber
(06 Jan 2004 19:52 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Tom Lord
(07 Jan 2004 00:54 UTC)
I don't believe in "(may GC)"
Tom Lord
(05 Jan 2004 01:21 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
Richard Kelsey
(05 Jan 2004 12:06 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
Shiro Kawai
(05 Jan 2004 12:45 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
bear
(05 Jan 2004 18:16 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
Tom Lord
(05 Jan 2004 17:00 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
bear
(05 Jan 2004 17:53 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
tb@xxxxxx
(06 Jan 2004 01:39 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
Michael Sperber
(06 Jan 2004 07:39 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
Felix Winkelmann
(06 Jan 2004 07:55 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
Michael Sperber
(06 Jan 2004 09:22 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
Felix Winkelmann
(06 Jan 2004 09:56 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
Michael Sperber
(06 Jan 2004 10:24 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
Felix Winkelmann
(06 Jan 2004 10:46 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
tb@xxxxxx
(06 Jan 2004 18:07 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
bear
(06 Jan 2004 18:51 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
Tom Lord
(06 Jan 2004 16:40 UTC)
Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
Jim Blandy
(07 Jan 2004 22:18 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Tom Lord
(05 Jan 2004 01:31 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Tom Lord
(05 Jan 2004 01:38 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Richard Kelsey
(05 Jan 2004 12:16 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Tom Lord
(05 Jan 2004 18:05 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Michael Sperber
(05 Jan 2004 19:03 UTC)
Re: no constants please
tb@xxxxxx
(06 Jan 2004 01:37 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Richard Kelsey
(06 Jan 2004 02:14 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Tom Lord
(06 Jan 2004 02:55 UTC)
Re: no constants please
tb@xxxxxx
(06 Jan 2004 02:31 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Richard Kelsey
(06 Jan 2004 03:09 UTC)
Re: no constants please
tb@xxxxxx
(06 Jan 2004 03:14 UTC)
Re: no constants please
Tom Lord
(06 Jan 2004 04:32 UTC)
when GC is permitted
Jim Blandy
(07 Jan 2004 22:01 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Richard Kelsey
(07 Jan 2004 22:33 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Tom Lord
(07 Jan 2004 23:14 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Jim Blandy
(08 Jan 2004 01:43 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Tom Lord
(08 Jan 2004 04:21 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Felix Winkelmann
(08 Jan 2004 07:33 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Jim Blandy
(08 Jan 2004 08:34 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Felix Winkelmann
(08 Jan 2004 08:58 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Jim Blandy
(08 Jan 2004 19:05 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Tom Lord
(08 Jan 2004 19:47 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Richard Kelsey
(08 Jan 2004 20:01 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Tom Lord
(08 Jan 2004 21:58 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Jim Blandy
(08 Jan 2004 22:58 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Tom Lord
(09 Jan 2004 00:06 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Jim Blandy
(08 Jan 2004 22:45 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Felix Winkelmann
(09 Jan 2004 06:42 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Richard Kelsey
(09 Jan 2004 15:04 UTC)
Oh.
Jim Blandy
(09 Jan 2004 23:30 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Tom Lord
(10 Jan 2004 18:57 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Michael Sperber
(10 Jan 2004 20:18 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Tom Lord
(10 Jan 2004 21:48 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Richard Kelsey
(10 Jan 2004 21:14 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Marc Feeley
(10 Jan 2004 21:30 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Tom Lord
(10 Jan 2004 22:17 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Matthew Dempsky
(11 Jan 2004 03:10 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Michael Sperber
(11 Jan 2004 09:58 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Matthew Dempsky
(11 Jan 2004 03:52 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Michael Sperber
(11 Jan 2004 12:14 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Tom Lord
(11 Jan 2004 17:05 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Michael Sperber
(14 Jan 2004 21:26 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Tom Lord
(14 Jan 2004 23:16 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Eric Knauel
(15 Jan 2004 13:44 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Tom Lord
(15 Jan 2004 17:59 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Tom Lord
(15 Jan 2004 18:04 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Matthew Dempsky
(11 Jan 2004 10:40 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
tb@xxxxxx
(11 Jan 2004 23:37 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Richard Kelsey
(12 Jan 2004 01:07 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
tb@xxxxxx
(12 Jan 2004 02:46 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Marc Feeley
(12 Jan 2004 03:55 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Michael Sperber
(14 Jan 2004 21:21 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Marc Feeley
(15 Jan 2004 02:45 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Richard Kelsey
(15 Jan 2004 03:51 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Matthew Dempsky
(12 Jan 2004 14:32 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Tom Lord
(11 Jan 2004 17:55 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
felix
(12 Jan 2004 04:38 UTC)
temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
Jim Blandy
(12 Jan 2004 21:31 UTC)
Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
tb@xxxxxx
(13 Jan 2004 01:25 UTC)
Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
Tom Lord
(13 Jan 2004 02:04 UTC)
Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
Jim Blandy
(14 Jan 2004 08:08 UTC)
Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Jim Blandy
(14 Jan 2004 09:06 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Tom Lord
(14 Jan 2004 18:40 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Jim Blandy
(14 Jan 2004 19:53 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Tom Lord
(14 Jan 2004 21:05 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Jim Blandy
(14 Jan 2004 21:22 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Tom Lord
(14 Jan 2004 22:09 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Jim Blandy
(14 Jan 2004 23:54 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Jim Blandy
(14 Jan 2004 20:45 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Tom Lord
(14 Jan 2004 21:41 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Jim Blandy
(14 Jan 2004 22:11 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Per Bothner
(14 Jan 2004 22:18 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Tom Lord
(14 Jan 2004 23:32 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
bear
(14 Jan 2004 23:55 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Per Bothner
(15 Jan 2004 00:30 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
bear
(15 Jan 2004 01:07 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Per Bothner
(15 Jan 2004 01:26 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Tom Lord
(15 Jan 2004 02:05 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Tom Lord
(15 Jan 2004 01:59 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Shiro Kawai
(15 Jan 2004 01:44 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Tom Lord
(15 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Shiro Kawai
(15 Jan 2004 02:28 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Tom Lord
(15 Jan 2004 03:37 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Shiro Kawai
(15 Jan 2004 00:30 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Tom Lord
(14 Jan 2004 18:53 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Jim Blandy
(14 Jan 2004 20:28 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Per Bothner
(14 Jan 2004 18:29 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Jim Blandy
(14 Jan 2004 20:30 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style
Tom Lord
(14 Jan 2004 21:12 UTC)
Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50
Michael Sperber
(14 Jan 2004 21:14 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Matthew Dempsky
(10 Jan 2004 15:40 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
felix
(12 Jan 2004 04:31 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
felix
(12 Jan 2004 21:13 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Jim Blandy
(12 Jan 2004 22:03 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
felix
(12 Jan 2004 22:52 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
tb@xxxxxx
(13 Jan 2004 01:23 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
bear
(13 Jan 2004 06:16 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Richard Kelsey
(13 Jan 2004 02:53 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
tb@xxxxxx
(13 Jan 2004 03:20 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Tom Lord
(08 Jan 2004 17:32 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Jim Blandy
(08 Jan 2004 19:37 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Tom Lord
(08 Jan 2004 20:36 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Jim Blandy
(08 Jan 2004 01:35 UTC)
Pika-style from first principles
Tom Lord
(05 Jan 2004 22:14 UTC)
Re: Pika-style from first principles
Marc Feeley
(06 Jan 2004 15:36 UTC)
Re: Pika-style from first principles
Michael Sperber
(06 Jan 2004 20:00 UTC)
Re: Pika-style from first principles
Marc Feeley
(07 Jan 2004 05:47 UTC)
Re: Pika-style from first principles
Michael Sperber
(07 Jan 2004 21:16 UTC)
Re: Pika-style from first principles
Marc Feeley
(08 Jan 2004 21:13 UTC)
Re: Pika-style from first principles
Michael Sperber
(10 Jan 2004 16:00 UTC)
Re: Pika-style from first principles
Marc Feeley
(10 Jan 2004 16:37 UTC)
Re: Pika-style from first principles
Michael Sperber
(10 Jan 2004 18:13 UTC)
Re: Pika-style from first principles
Marc Feeley
(10 Jan 2004 20:44 UTC)
Re: Pika-style from first principles
felix
(12 Jan 2004 04:37 UTC)
Re: Pika-style from first principles
Michael Sperber
(13 Jan 2004 21:46 UTC)
Re: Pika-style from first principles
Felix Winkelmann
(14 Jan 2004 06:25 UTC)
Performance
Felix Winkelmann
(06 Jan 2004 06:59 UTC)
Portability
Felix Winkelmann
(06 Jan 2004 07:15 UTC)
Re: Portability
Felix Winkelmann
(06 Jan 2004 07:23 UTC)
Restrictions
Felix Winkelmann
(06 Jan 2004 07:23 UTC)
(Previous discussion continued)
Re: Restrictions
Michael Sperber
(06 Jan 2004 07:35 UTC)
Re: Restrictions
Felix Winkelmann
(06 Jan 2004 07:48 UTC)
Re: Restrictions
Michael Sperber
(06 Jan 2004 09:24 UTC)
Re: Restrictions
Felix Winkelmann
(06 Jan 2004 09:51 UTC)
Re: Restrictions
Michael Sperber
(06 Jan 2004 10:37 UTC)
Re: Restrictions
Felix Winkelmann
(06 Jan 2004 10:57 UTC)
Reliability
Felix Winkelmann
(06 Jan 2004 08:02 UTC)
A note on process
Michael Sperber
(06 Jan 2004 10:56 UTC)
Re: A note on process
Felix Winkelmann
(06 Jan 2004 11:25 UTC)
Re: A note on process
Michael Sperber
(06 Jan 2004 11:41 UTC)
Re: A note on process
Felix Winkelmann
(06 Jan 2004 12:36 UTC)
Re: A note on process
Michael Sperber
(06 Jan 2004 13:10 UTC)
Re: A note on process
Felix Winkelmann
(06 Jan 2004 13:18 UTC)
Re: A note on process
Tom Lord
(06 Jan 2004 21:58 UTC)
scheme_lookup_imported_binding
David Van Horn
(06 Jan 2004 16:25 UTC)
Re: when GC is permitted
Benderjg@xxxxxx
(15 Jan 2004 01:26 UTC)
kind request for a sync()
sebastian.egner@xxxxxx
(15 Jan 2004 08:42 UTC)
strings draft
Tom Lord
(22 Jan 2004 05:11 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Shiro Kawai
(22 Jan 2004 09:46 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord
(22 Jan 2004 17:45 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Shiro Kawai
(23 Jan 2004 05:03 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord
(24 Jan 2004 00:45 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Matthew Dempsky
(23 Jan 2004 20:01 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Shiro Kawai
(24 Jan 2004 03:26 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord
(24 Jan 2004 04:31 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Shiro Kawai
(24 Jan 2004 04:49 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord
(24 Jan 2004 19:01 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Shiro Kawai
(24 Jan 2004 22:15 UTC)
Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
Shiro Kawai
(26 Jan 2004 09:58 UTC)
Strings, one last detail.
bear
(30 Jan 2004 21:12 UTC)
Re: Strings, one last detail.
Shiro Kawai
(30 Jan 2004 21:43 UTC)
Re: Strings, one last detail.
Tom Lord
(31 Jan 2004 00:27 UTC)
Re: Strings, one last detail.
bear
(31 Jan 2004 20:25 UTC)
Re: Strings, one last detail.
Tom Lord
(31 Jan 2004 20:56 UTC)
Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
bear
(26 Jan 2004 19:04 UTC)
Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
Matthew Dempsky
(26 Jan 2004 13:13 UTC)
Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
Matthew Dempsky
(26 Jan 2004 13:41 UTC)
Re: Octet vs Char
Shiro Kawai
(26 Jan 2004 23:38 UTC)
Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
Ken Dickey
(26 Jan 2004 19:40 UTC)
Re: Octet vs Char
Shiro Kawai
(27 Jan 2004 05:10 UTC)
Re: Octet vs Char
Tom Lord
(27 Jan 2004 05:37 UTC)
Re: Octet vs Char
bear
(27 Jan 2004 08:35 UTC)
Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
bear
(27 Jan 2004 08:32 UTC)
Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
Ken Dickey
(27 Jan 2004 06:50 UTC)
Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
bear
(27 Jan 2004 19:06 UTC)
Re: strings draft
bear
(22 Jan 2004 19:05 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord
(23 Jan 2004 02:06 UTC)
READ-OCTET (Re: strings draft)
Shiro Kawai
(23 Jan 2004 06:00 UTC)
Re: strings draft
bear
(23 Jan 2004 07:04 UTC)
Re: strings draft
bear
(23 Jan 2004 07:20 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord
(24 Jan 2004 00:15 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Alex Shinn
(26 Jan 2004 01:58 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord
(26 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC)
Re: strings draft
bear
(26 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord
(26 Jan 2004 03:01 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Alex Shinn
(26 Jan 2004 03:00 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord
(26 Jan 2004 03:27 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Shiro Kawai
(26 Jan 2004 04:57 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Alex Shinn
(26 Jan 2004 04:57 UTC)
Re: strings draft
tb@xxxxxx
(23 Jan 2004 18:48 UTC)
Re: strings draft
bear
(24 Jan 2004 02:21 UTC)
Re: strings draft
tb@xxxxxx
(23 Jan 2004 02:09 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord
(23 Jan 2004 02:42 UTC)
Re: strings draft
tb@xxxxxx
(23 Jan 2004 02:44 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord
(23 Jan 2004 03:07 UTC)
Re: strings draft
tb@xxxxxx
(23 Jan 2004 03:04 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord
(23 Jan 2004 03:29 UTC)
Re: strings draft
tb@xxxxxx
(23 Jan 2004 03:42 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Alex Shinn
(23 Jan 2004 02:34 UTC)
Re: strings draft
tb@xxxxxx
(23 Jan 2004 02:42 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord
(23 Jan 2004 03:02 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Alex Shinn
(23 Jan 2004 02:58 UTC)
Re: strings draft
tb@xxxxxx
(23 Jan 2004 03:13 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Alex Shinn
(23 Jan 2004 03:18 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Bradd W. Szonye
(23 Jan 2004 19:31 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Alex Shinn
(26 Jan 2004 02:21 UTC)
Re: strings draft
tb@xxxxxx
(23 Jan 2004 03:12 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Alex Shinn
(23 Jan 2004 03:28 UTC)
Re: strings draft
tb@xxxxxx
(23 Jan 2004 03:44 UTC)
Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
Ken Dickey
(23 Jan 2004 08:07 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
bear
(23 Jan 2004 17:55 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
tb@xxxxxx
(23 Jan 2004 18:50 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
Per Bothner
(23 Jan 2004 18:56 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
Tom Lord
(23 Jan 2004 20:39 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
Per Bothner
(23 Jan 2004 20:57 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
Tom Lord
(23 Jan 2004 21:57 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
Tom Lord
(23 Jan 2004 20:20 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
tb@xxxxxx
(23 Jan 2004 21:22 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
Tom Lord
(23 Jan 2004 22:52 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
tb@xxxxxx
(24 Jan 2004 06:48 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
Tom Lord
(24 Jan 2004 18:55 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
tb@xxxxxx
(24 Jan 2004 19:34 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
Tom Lord
(24 Jan 2004 22:02 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
Ken Dickey
(23 Jan 2004 12:53 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
Tom Lord
(23 Jan 2004 23:35 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
Ken Dickey
(24 Jan 2004 16:10 UTC)
Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft]
Tom Lord
(25 Jan 2004 03:14 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Matthew Dempsky
(25 Jan 2004 00:00 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord
(25 Jan 2004 07:29 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Matthew Dempsky
(26 Jan 2004 16:53 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Tom Lord
(27 Jan 2004 00:44 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Paul Schlie
(23 Jan 2004 02:48 UTC)
Re: strings draft
tb@xxxxxx
(23 Jan 2004 03:45 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Paul Schlie
(23 Jan 2004 12:16 UTC)
Re: strings draft (musings)
Paul Schlie
(23 Jan 2004 14:14 UTC)
Re: strings draft
tb@xxxxxx
(23 Jan 2004 18:52 UTC)
Re: strings draft
Paul Schlie
(23 Jan 2004 21:26 UTC)
Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?)
Paul Schlie
(24 Jan 2004 21:16 UTC)
Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?)
Tom Lord
(24 Jan 2004 22:18 UTC)
Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?)
Paul Schlie
(24 Jan 2004 22:17 UTC)
proposed srfi for extended character sets
Tom Lord
(27 Jan 2004 00:34 UTC)
Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft)
Paul Schlie
(27 Jan 2004 00:40 UTC)
Clarification of SCHEME_GC_PROTECT/SCHEME_GC_UNPROTECT
bear
(30 Jan 2004 21:29 UTC)