Thread Index - January 2004 - srfi-50@srfi.schemers.org

null-terminated strings vs. strings with length Sebastian Egner (01 Jan 2004 15:04 UTC)

Re: null-terminated strings vs. strings with length Richard Kelsey (05 Jan 2004 12:27 UTC)

(Previous discussion continued)

Re: Strings/chars Jim Blandy (08 Jan 2004 08:09 UTC)

Re: Strings/chars Shiro Kawai (08 Jan 2004 09:45 UTC)

Re: Strings/chars Jim Blandy (08 Jan 2004 19:46 UTC)

Re: Strings/chars Shiro Kawai (08 Jan 2004 21:59 UTC)

Re: Strings/chars tb@xxxxxx (08 Jan 2004 22:16 UTC)

Re: Strings/chars Jim Blandy (08 Jan 2004 23:04 UTC)

Re: Strings/chars tb@xxxxxx (08 Jan 2004 23:28 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (03 Jan 2004 16:12 UTC)

Re: Couple things... bear (03 Jan 2004 19:42 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (03 Jan 2004 19:54 UTC)

Re: Couple things... felix (04 Jan 2004 18:53 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Tom Lord (04 Jan 2004 22:39 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (05 Jan 2004 19:17 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Tom Lord (05 Jan 2004 22:19 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (06 Jan 2004 20:36 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (05 Jan 2004 19:19 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Jim Blandy (08 Jan 2004 08:25 UTC)

Re: Couple things... bear (08 Jan 2004 16:56 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Jim Blandy (08 Jan 2004 19:51 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Tom Lord (08 Jan 2004 21:01 UTC)

Re: Couple things... tb@xxxxxx (08 Jan 2004 22:08 UTC)

Re: Couple things... bear (09 Jan 2004 05:06 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Bradd W. Szonye (09 Jan 2004 18:08 UTC)

Re: Couple things... bear (10 Jan 2004 00:01 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (17 Jan 2004 15:58 UTC)

Re: Couple things... bear (18 Jan 2004 05:58 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Michael Sperber (18 Jan 2004 10:18 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Tom Lord (18 Jan 2004 16:21 UTC)

Re: Couple things... bear (18 Jan 2004 21:09 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Tom Lord (18 Jan 2004 21:53 UTC)

Re: Couple things... bear (19 Jan 2004 01:28 UTC)

Re: Couple things... Tom Lord (19 Jan 2004 02:59 UTC)

Re: Couple things... felix (04 Jan 2004 18:45 UTC)

(Previous discussion continued)

Re: non-local exits are icky Michael Sperber (03 Jan 2004 16:16 UTC)

Re: non-local exits are icky Tom Lord (04 Jan 2004 01:19 UTC)

(Previous discussion continued)

Re: no constants please Tom Lord (04 Jan 2004 01:16 UTC)

Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (04 Jan 2004 18:09 UTC)

Re: no constants please felix (04 Jan 2004 19:28 UTC)

Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (04 Jan 2004 20:06 UTC)

Re: no constants please Tom Lord (04 Jan 2004 21:39 UTC)

Re: no constants please Tom Lord (04 Jan 2004 22:09 UTC)

Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (04 Jan 2004 22:58 UTC)

Re: no constants please Tom Lord (05 Jan 2004 01:16 UTC)

Re: no constants please Tom Lord (05 Jan 2004 01:45 UTC)

Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (05 Jan 2004 11:40 UTC)

Re: no constants please Tom Lord (05 Jan 2004 16:51 UTC)

Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (05 Jan 2004 17:48 UTC)

Re: no constants please Tom Lord (05 Jan 2004 18:50 UTC)

Re: no constants please Michael Sperber (05 Jan 2004 18:48 UTC)

Re: no constants please Tom Lord (05 Jan 2004 22:26 UTC)

Re: no constants please Michael Sperber (06 Jan 2004 07:42 UTC)

Re: no constants please Tom Lord (06 Jan 2004 17:25 UTC)

Re: no constants please Michael Sperber (06 Jan 2004 19:52 UTC)

Re: no constants please Tom Lord (07 Jan 2004 00:54 UTC)

I don't believe in "(may GC)" Tom Lord (05 Jan 2004 01:21 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Richard Kelsey (05 Jan 2004 12:06 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Shiro Kawai (05 Jan 2004 12:45 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" bear (05 Jan 2004 18:16 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Tom Lord (05 Jan 2004 17:00 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" bear (05 Jan 2004 17:53 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" tb@xxxxxx (06 Jan 2004 01:39 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Michael Sperber (06 Jan 2004 07:39 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Felix Winkelmann (06 Jan 2004 07:55 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Michael Sperber (06 Jan 2004 09:22 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Felix Winkelmann (06 Jan 2004 09:56 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Michael Sperber (06 Jan 2004 10:24 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Felix Winkelmann (06 Jan 2004 10:46 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" tb@xxxxxx (06 Jan 2004 18:07 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" bear (06 Jan 2004 18:51 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Tom Lord (06 Jan 2004 16:40 UTC)

Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)" Jim Blandy (07 Jan 2004 22:18 UTC)

Re: no constants please Tom Lord (05 Jan 2004 01:31 UTC)

Re: no constants please Tom Lord (05 Jan 2004 01:38 UTC)

Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (05 Jan 2004 12:16 UTC)

Re: no constants please Tom Lord (05 Jan 2004 18:05 UTC)

Re: no constants please Michael Sperber (05 Jan 2004 19:03 UTC)

Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx (06 Jan 2004 01:37 UTC)

Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (06 Jan 2004 02:14 UTC)

Re: no constants please Tom Lord (06 Jan 2004 02:55 UTC)

Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx (06 Jan 2004 02:31 UTC)

Re: no constants please Richard Kelsey (06 Jan 2004 03:09 UTC)

Re: no constants please tb@xxxxxx (06 Jan 2004 03:14 UTC)

Re: no constants please Tom Lord (06 Jan 2004 04:32 UTC)

when GC is permitted Jim Blandy (07 Jan 2004 22:01 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey (07 Jan 2004 22:33 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord (07 Jan 2004 23:14 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy (08 Jan 2004 01:43 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord (08 Jan 2004 04:21 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Felix Winkelmann (08 Jan 2004 07:33 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy (08 Jan 2004 08:34 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Felix Winkelmann (08 Jan 2004 08:58 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy (08 Jan 2004 19:05 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord (08 Jan 2004 19:47 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey (08 Jan 2004 20:01 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord (08 Jan 2004 21:58 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy (08 Jan 2004 22:58 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord (09 Jan 2004 00:06 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy (08 Jan 2004 22:45 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Felix Winkelmann (09 Jan 2004 06:42 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey (09 Jan 2004 15:04 UTC)

Oh. Jim Blandy (09 Jan 2004 23:30 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord (10 Jan 2004 18:57 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Michael Sperber (10 Jan 2004 20:18 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord (10 Jan 2004 21:48 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey (10 Jan 2004 21:14 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Marc Feeley (10 Jan 2004 21:30 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord (10 Jan 2004 22:17 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Matthew Dempsky (11 Jan 2004 03:10 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Michael Sperber (11 Jan 2004 09:58 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Matthew Dempsky (11 Jan 2004 03:52 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Michael Sperber (11 Jan 2004 12:14 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord (11 Jan 2004 17:05 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Michael Sperber (14 Jan 2004 21:26 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord (14 Jan 2004 23:16 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Eric Knauel (15 Jan 2004 13:44 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord (15 Jan 2004 17:59 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord (15 Jan 2004 18:04 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Matthew Dempsky (11 Jan 2004 10:40 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted tb@xxxxxx (11 Jan 2004 23:37 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey (12 Jan 2004 01:07 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted tb@xxxxxx (12 Jan 2004 02:46 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Marc Feeley (12 Jan 2004 03:55 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Michael Sperber (14 Jan 2004 21:21 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Marc Feeley (15 Jan 2004 02:45 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey (15 Jan 2004 03:51 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Matthew Dempsky (12 Jan 2004 14:32 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord (11 Jan 2004 17:55 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted felix (12 Jan 2004 04:38 UTC)

temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 Jim Blandy (12 Jan 2004 21:31 UTC)

Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 tb@xxxxxx (13 Jan 2004 01:25 UTC)

Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 Tom Lord (13 Jan 2004 02:04 UTC)

Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 Jim Blandy (14 Jan 2004 08:08 UTC)

Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy (14 Jan 2004 09:06 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord (14 Jan 2004 18:40 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy (14 Jan 2004 19:53 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord (14 Jan 2004 21:05 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy (14 Jan 2004 21:22 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord (14 Jan 2004 22:09 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy (14 Jan 2004 23:54 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy (14 Jan 2004 20:45 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord (14 Jan 2004 21:41 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy (14 Jan 2004 22:11 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Per Bothner (14 Jan 2004 22:18 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord (14 Jan 2004 23:32 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style bear (14 Jan 2004 23:55 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Per Bothner (15 Jan 2004 00:30 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style bear (15 Jan 2004 01:07 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Per Bothner (15 Jan 2004 01:26 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord (15 Jan 2004 02:05 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord (15 Jan 2004 01:59 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Shiro Kawai (15 Jan 2004 01:44 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord (15 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Shiro Kawai (15 Jan 2004 02:28 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord (15 Jan 2004 03:37 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Shiro Kawai (15 Jan 2004 00:30 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord (14 Jan 2004 18:53 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy (14 Jan 2004 20:28 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Per Bothner (14 Jan 2004 18:29 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Jim Blandy (14 Jan 2004 20:30 UTC)

Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord (14 Jan 2004 21:12 UTC)

Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 Michael Sperber (14 Jan 2004 21:14 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Matthew Dempsky (10 Jan 2004 15:40 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted felix (12 Jan 2004 04:31 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted felix (12 Jan 2004 21:13 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy (12 Jan 2004 22:03 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted felix (12 Jan 2004 22:52 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted tb@xxxxxx (13 Jan 2004 01:23 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted bear (13 Jan 2004 06:16 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Richard Kelsey (13 Jan 2004 02:53 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted tb@xxxxxx (13 Jan 2004 03:20 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord (08 Jan 2004 17:32 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy (08 Jan 2004 19:37 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Tom Lord (08 Jan 2004 20:36 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Jim Blandy (08 Jan 2004 01:35 UTC)

Pika-style from first principles Tom Lord (05 Jan 2004 22:14 UTC)

Re: Pika-style from first principles Marc Feeley (06 Jan 2004 15:36 UTC)

Re: Pika-style from first principles Michael Sperber (06 Jan 2004 20:00 UTC)

Re: Pika-style from first principles Marc Feeley (07 Jan 2004 05:47 UTC)

Re: Pika-style from first principles Michael Sperber (07 Jan 2004 21:16 UTC)

Re: Pika-style from first principles Marc Feeley (08 Jan 2004 21:13 UTC)

Re: Pika-style from first principles Michael Sperber (10 Jan 2004 16:00 UTC)

Re: Pika-style from first principles Marc Feeley (10 Jan 2004 16:37 UTC)

Re: Pika-style from first principles Michael Sperber (10 Jan 2004 18:13 UTC)

Re: Pika-style from first principles Marc Feeley (10 Jan 2004 20:44 UTC)

Re: Pika-style from first principles felix (12 Jan 2004 04:37 UTC)

Re: Pika-style from first principles Michael Sperber (13 Jan 2004 21:46 UTC)

Re: Pika-style from first principles Felix Winkelmann (14 Jan 2004 06:25 UTC)

Performance Felix Winkelmann (06 Jan 2004 06:59 UTC)

Portability Felix Winkelmann (06 Jan 2004 07:15 UTC)

Re: Portability Felix Winkelmann (06 Jan 2004 07:23 UTC)

Restrictions Felix Winkelmann (06 Jan 2004 07:23 UTC)

(Previous discussion continued)

Re: Restrictions Michael Sperber (06 Jan 2004 07:35 UTC)

Re: Restrictions Felix Winkelmann (06 Jan 2004 07:48 UTC)

Re: Restrictions Michael Sperber (06 Jan 2004 09:24 UTC)

Re: Restrictions Felix Winkelmann (06 Jan 2004 09:51 UTC)

Re: Restrictions Michael Sperber (06 Jan 2004 10:37 UTC)

Re: Restrictions Felix Winkelmann (06 Jan 2004 10:57 UTC)

Reliability Felix Winkelmann (06 Jan 2004 08:02 UTC)

A note on process Michael Sperber (06 Jan 2004 10:56 UTC)

Re: A note on process Felix Winkelmann (06 Jan 2004 11:25 UTC)

Re: A note on process Michael Sperber (06 Jan 2004 11:41 UTC)

Re: A note on process Felix Winkelmann (06 Jan 2004 12:36 UTC)

Re: A note on process Michael Sperber (06 Jan 2004 13:10 UTC)

Re: A note on process Felix Winkelmann (06 Jan 2004 13:18 UTC)

Re: A note on process Tom Lord (06 Jan 2004 21:58 UTC)

scheme_lookup_imported_binding David Van Horn (06 Jan 2004 16:25 UTC)

Re: when GC is permitted Benderjg@xxxxxx (15 Jan 2004 01:26 UTC)

kind request for a sync() sebastian.egner@xxxxxx (15 Jan 2004 08:42 UTC)

strings draft Tom Lord (22 Jan 2004 05:11 UTC)

Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai (22 Jan 2004 09:46 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (22 Jan 2004 17:45 UTC)

Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai (23 Jan 2004 05:03 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (24 Jan 2004 00:45 UTC)

Re: strings draft Matthew Dempsky (23 Jan 2004 20:01 UTC)

Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai (24 Jan 2004 03:26 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (24 Jan 2004 04:31 UTC)

Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai (24 Jan 2004 04:49 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (24 Jan 2004 19:01 UTC)

Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai (24 Jan 2004 22:15 UTC)

Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Shiro Kawai (26 Jan 2004 09:58 UTC)

Strings, one last detail. bear (30 Jan 2004 21:12 UTC)

Re: Strings, one last detail. Shiro Kawai (30 Jan 2004 21:43 UTC)

Re: Strings, one last detail. Tom Lord (31 Jan 2004 00:27 UTC)

Re: Strings, one last detail. bear (31 Jan 2004 20:25 UTC)

Re: Strings, one last detail. Tom Lord (31 Jan 2004 20:56 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) bear (26 Jan 2004 19:04 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Matthew Dempsky (26 Jan 2004 13:13 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Matthew Dempsky (26 Jan 2004 13:41 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char Shiro Kawai (26 Jan 2004 23:38 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Ken Dickey (26 Jan 2004 19:40 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char Shiro Kawai (27 Jan 2004 05:10 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char Tom Lord (27 Jan 2004 05:37 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char bear (27 Jan 2004 08:35 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) bear (27 Jan 2004 08:32 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Ken Dickey (27 Jan 2004 06:50 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) bear (27 Jan 2004 19:06 UTC)

Re: strings draft bear (22 Jan 2004 19:05 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 02:06 UTC)

READ-OCTET (Re: strings draft) Shiro Kawai (23 Jan 2004 06:00 UTC)

Re: strings draft bear (23 Jan 2004 07:04 UTC)

Re: strings draft bear (23 Jan 2004 07:20 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (24 Jan 2004 00:15 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (26 Jan 2004 01:58 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (26 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC)

Re: strings draft bear (26 Jan 2004 02:35 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (26 Jan 2004 03:01 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (26 Jan 2004 03:00 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (26 Jan 2004 03:27 UTC)

Re: strings draft Shiro Kawai (26 Jan 2004 04:57 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (26 Jan 2004 04:57 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 18:48 UTC)

Re: strings draft bear (24 Jan 2004 02:21 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 02:09 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 02:42 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 02:44 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 03:07 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 03:04 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 03:29 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 03:42 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (23 Jan 2004 02:34 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 02:42 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 03:02 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (23 Jan 2004 02:58 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 03:13 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (23 Jan 2004 03:18 UTC)

Re: strings draft Bradd W. Szonye (23 Jan 2004 19:31 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (26 Jan 2004 02:21 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 03:12 UTC)

Re: strings draft Alex Shinn (23 Jan 2004 03:28 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 03:44 UTC)

Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Ken Dickey (23 Jan 2004 08:07 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] bear (23 Jan 2004 17:55 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 18:50 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Per Bothner (23 Jan 2004 18:56 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 20:39 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Per Bothner (23 Jan 2004 20:57 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 21:57 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 20:20 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 21:22 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 22:52 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx (24 Jan 2004 06:48 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (24 Jan 2004 18:55 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] tb@xxxxxx (24 Jan 2004 19:34 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (24 Jan 2004 22:02 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Ken Dickey (23 Jan 2004 12:53 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (23 Jan 2004 23:35 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Ken Dickey (24 Jan 2004 16:10 UTC)

Re: Parsing Scheme [was Re: strings draft] Tom Lord (25 Jan 2004 03:14 UTC)

Re: strings draft Matthew Dempsky (25 Jan 2004 00:00 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (25 Jan 2004 07:29 UTC)

Re: strings draft Matthew Dempsky (26 Jan 2004 16:53 UTC)

Re: strings draft Tom Lord (27 Jan 2004 00:44 UTC)

Re: strings draft Paul Schlie (23 Jan 2004 02:48 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 03:45 UTC)

Re: strings draft Paul Schlie (23 Jan 2004 12:16 UTC)

Re: strings draft (musings) Paul Schlie (23 Jan 2004 14:14 UTC)

Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 18:52 UTC)

Re: strings draft Paul Schlie (23 Jan 2004 21:26 UTC)

Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?) Paul Schlie (24 Jan 2004 21:16 UTC)

Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?) Tom Lord (24 Jan 2004 22:18 UTC)

Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?) Paul Schlie (24 Jan 2004 22:17 UTC)

proposed srfi for extended character sets Tom Lord (27 Jan 2004 00:34 UTC)

Re: Octet vs Char (Re: strings draft) Paul Schlie (27 Jan 2004 00:40 UTC)

Clarification of SCHEME_GC_PROTECT/SCHEME_GC_UNPROTECT bear (30 Jan 2004 21:29 UTC)