Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 tb@xxxxxx 13 Jan 2004 01:25 UTC

Jim Blandy <> writes:

> As long as SRFI's of both sorts become available within the next year,
> the right thing will happen.  I don't think it's necessary for SRFI-50
> to be withdrawn until a more opaque SRFI is written.

What confidence do we have that the more opaque SRFI will be written?
(Are there people working on drafts now?)