Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord (14 Jan 2004 21:12 UTC)
Re: Comparing Pika-syle and JNI-style Tom Lord 14 Jan 2004 21:12 UTC
> From: Jim Blandy <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Per Bothner <email@example.com> writes:
> > This of course cries out for a C++ interface which can alleviate
> > these problems:
> Yes --- all the effort Stroustrup and friends put into supporting GC
> can be brought to bear here. I think this is true of both Pika and
I think it comes out much nicer, syntactically, in JNI/Minor-style
(but in exchange for run-time costs in many possible implementations
and yadda yadda yadda :-).
Now if we had a DEFMACRO for C .....