Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 Michael Sperber (14 Jan 2004 21:14 UTC)
Re: temporarily withdrawing SRFI-50 Michael Sperber 14 Jan 2004 21:14 UTC
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Thomas> Jim Blandy <email@example.com> writes:
>> As long as SRFI's of both sorts become available within the next year,
>> the right thing will happen. I don't think it's necessary for SRFI-50
>> to be withdrawn until a more opaque SRFI is written.
Thomas> What confidence do we have that the more opaque SRFI will be written?
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, VÃ¶lkerverstÃ¤ndigung und Ã¼berhaupt blabla