Email list hosting service & mailing list manager

Re: strings draft Paul Schlie (23 Jan 2004 02:48 UTC)
Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 03:45 UTC)
Re: strings draft Paul Schlie (23 Jan 2004 12:16 UTC)
Re: strings draft (musings) Paul Schlie (23 Jan 2004 14:14 UTC)
Re: strings draft tb@xxxxxx (23 Jan 2004 18:52 UTC)
Re: strings draft Paul Schlie (23 Jan 2004 21:26 UTC)
Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?) Paul Schlie (24 Jan 2004 22:17 UTC)

Re: strings draft (premature, need first class type definition support first?) Paul Schlie 24 Jan 2004 22:17 UTC

unfortunately likely true (although still wish it weren't).

> From: Tom Lord <xxxxxx@emf.net>
>
>> This I suspect is possibly really what folks should be spending their time
>> to refine, because if scheme more natively supported the ability to define
>> new first-class data types/sub-types, and correspondingly extend it's core
>> procedures to be aware of them; numerous new facilitates and features could
>> be experimented with and refined, without having to require a language
>> revision or new implementation to enable it.
>
> I think you are on the scent of a red herring.