More JNI vs. Pika comparison
Jim Blandy
(17 Feb 2004 23:22 UTC)
|
Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
Matthew Dempsky
(18 Feb 2004 08:09 UTC)
|
Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
Jim Blandy
(18 Feb 2004 08:39 UTC)
|
Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison Matthew Dempsky (18 Feb 2004 15:46 UTC)
|
Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
Tom Lord
(20 Feb 2004 17:32 UTC)
|
Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
Jim Blandy
(24 Feb 2004 22:13 UTC)
|
Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
Tom Lord
(24 Feb 2004 22:32 UTC)
|
Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
Jim Blandy
(24 Feb 2004 23:23 UTC)
|
Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison
Tom Lord
(25 Feb 2004 00:16 UTC)
|
Re: More JNI vs. Pika comparison Matthew Dempsky 18 Feb 2004 15:47 UTC
Jim Blandy <xxxxxx@redhat.com> writes: > There are special statements like 'YYABORT;' and 'YYACCEPT;' that you > can use in semantic actions to exit the parser non-locally in various > ways. In info, see '(bison)Action Features'. > > Why? Well, my first attempt at a solution was going to be "hey, Bison doesn't support errors properly so we'll need to fix the semantic actions anyways!", but that probably won't hold up... Pika's FFI at present (but most likely not indefinitely) does not support any constructs that could be used conveniently with Bison (as far as I can tell) without modification to Bison, butq my role at present is just fleshing out the specifications for Pika that Tom has written so far (which are very sparse) so maybe you'll have better luck getting an answer from him once he's available again. -jivera