Re: I don't believe in "(may GC)"
Michael Sperber 06 Jan 2004 07:39 UTC
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell <xxxxxx@becket.net> writes:
Thomas> Richard Kelsey <xxxxxx@s48.org> writes:
>> If I'm using some exotic number representation (constructive reals,
>> perhaps), then EXTRACT_DOUBLE may very well involve some pretty hairy,
>> hence possibly GC-causing, computation.
>>
>> This doesn't worry me too much; there aren't a lot of such
>> implementations around.
Let me rephrase: In what kind of environment would "hairy"
*necessarily* imply "GC-causing"?
(There used to be a version of Scheme 48 where the equivalent of
SCHEME_EXTRACT_LONG could cause a GC because it could do a callback.
This was an implementation convenience, not a necessity, and it's gone
now.)
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla