|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 02:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(13 Feb 2004 03:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 05:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(13 Feb 2004 06:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 08:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Robby Findler
(13 Feb 2004 15:01 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 17:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 18:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Robby Findler
(16 Feb 2004 01:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(16 Feb 2004 03:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(16 Feb 2004 04:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Robby Findler
(16 Feb 2004 04:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
bear
(13 Feb 2004 17:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Per Bothner
(13 Feb 2004 18:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 19:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(13 Feb 2004 19:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings. Paul Schlie (13 Feb 2004 19:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Per Bothner
(13 Feb 2004 19:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 19:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
bear
(13 Feb 2004 21:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(13 Feb 2004 21:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 23:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(14 Feb 2004 00:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
bear
(14 Feb 2004 01:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(14 Feb 2004 01:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(14 Feb 2004 02:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(14 Feb 2004 03:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(14 Feb 2004 03:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(14 Feb 2004 03:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(14 Feb 2004 03:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(14 Feb 2004 02:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(14 Feb 2004 03:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(14 Feb 2004 03:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(14 Feb 2004 03:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 22:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(13 Feb 2004 17:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 18:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(13 Feb 2004 18:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Ken Dickey
(13 Feb 2004 21:53 UTC)
|
|
RESET [was Re: Encodings]
Ken Dickey
(14 Feb 2004 16:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: RESET [was Re: Encodings]
bear
(14 Feb 2004 18:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: RESET [was Re: Encodings]
Bradd W. Szonye
(14 Feb 2004 19:38 UTC)
|
No argument, extensions are extensions, just don't think it should be "standard". (as such I suspect you're arguing it shouldn't be explicitly prohibited, which seem quiet reasonable.) -paul- > From: "Bradd W. Szonye" <xxxxxx@szonye.com> > Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:05:37 -0800 > To: srfi-52@srfi.schemers.org > Subject: Re: Encodings. > Resent-From: srfi-52@srfi.schemers.org > Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:05:47 +0100 (NFT) > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 02:02:35PM -0500, Paul Schlie wrote: >> Yup, same basic page; with a few asides: >> >> - still don't suspect it's a good idea to specify any particular encoding >> for scheme's required character-set. > > Agreed, but I don't have any problem with a SRFI or standardized option > that permits it and defines "this is how it should work if you implement > the feature." > >> - still don¹t suspect it's a good idea to allow potentially non-portable >> characters to be used in identifier or comments. > > This is effectively saying that extensions in this area are bad, and I > can't agree with that. > -- > Bradd W. Szonye > http://www.szonye.com/bradd >
