|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 02:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(13 Feb 2004 03:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 05:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(13 Feb 2004 06:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 08:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Robby Findler
(13 Feb 2004 15:01 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 17:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 18:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Robby Findler
(16 Feb 2004 01:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(16 Feb 2004 03:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(16 Feb 2004 04:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Robby Findler
(16 Feb 2004 04:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
bear
(13 Feb 2004 17:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Per Bothner
(13 Feb 2004 18:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 19:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(13 Feb 2004 19:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 19:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Per Bothner
(13 Feb 2004 19:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 19:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
bear
(13 Feb 2004 21:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(13 Feb 2004 21:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 23:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(14 Feb 2004 00:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
bear
(14 Feb 2004 01:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(14 Feb 2004 01:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(14 Feb 2004 02:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(14 Feb 2004 03:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(14 Feb 2004 03:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(14 Feb 2004 03:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(14 Feb 2004 03:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(14 Feb 2004 02:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings. Bradd W. Szonye (14 Feb 2004 03:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(14 Feb 2004 03:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(14 Feb 2004 03:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 22:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(13 Feb 2004 17:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Paul Schlie
(13 Feb 2004 18:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Bradd W. Szonye
(13 Feb 2004 18:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: Encodings.
Ken Dickey
(13 Feb 2004 21:53 UTC)
|
|
RESET [was Re: Encodings]
Ken Dickey
(14 Feb 2004 16:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: RESET [was Re: Encodings]
bear
(14 Feb 2004 18:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: RESET [was Re: Encodings]
Bradd W. Szonye
(14 Feb 2004 19:38 UTC)
|
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 09:19:21PM -0500, Paul Schlie wrote: > From the best I can tell, there is no difference between opening a > file using C's fopen function in binary mode or text mode, with the > exception Of local conversion of new-line marker character(s) in VMS, > MS-whatever, UNIX, MAC, etc.; both can be read/written logically > sequentially .... Yes, the "text is filtered binary stream" abstraction is very common. But it is not universal. It is not true on MVS, for example. (When I wrote "VMS" earlier, it was a typo for "MVS.") Indeed, it's partly because of systems like MVS that C makes the distinction between text and binary mode. If you insist on forcing that abstraction into Scheme standards, then you make it impossible to sensibly implement Scheme on many mainframe computers and anything else where that abstraction is invalid. -- Bradd W. Szonye http://www.szonye.com/bradd
