Re: Initial comments & questions
Ken Dickey
(20 Mar 2004 16:20 UTC)
|
Re: Initial comments & questions
Andre van Tonder
(21 Mar 2004 13:28 UTC)
|
Re: Initial comments & questions Andre van Tonder (21 Mar 2004 14:09 UTC)
|
Re: Initial comments & questions
Ken Dickey
(22 Mar 2004 00:11 UTC)
|
Re: Initial comments & questions
Andre van Tonder
(22 Mar 2004 18:00 UTC)
|
Re: Initial comments & questions Andre van Tonder 21 Mar 2004 14:09 UTC
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Andre van Tonder wrote: > Taylor's debug messages. For example: > > (syntax-do (x <- ......) > (syntax-message "The intermediate result is:" x) > (syntax-if (atom? x) > (syntax-do (syntax-warning "Atoms may explode if split") > (y <- ......) > (syntax-message "y = " y) > (z <- ......) > . > . > > Note that this would be an argument for keeping both the current <- arrows > and the current indentation and bracketing. Another possibility: 1) Indeed use syntax-bind, only for sequential bindings a la let*: (syntax-bind ((x (syntax-return (1 2 3))) (y (syntax-reverse x)) (z (syntax-reverse y))) (syntax-return z)) 2) Perhaps in future have syntax-begin for imperative things like syntax-debug-message. The above syntax-do example becomes (syntax-bind ((x (.......))) (syntax-begin (syntax-debug-message "Intermediate result = " x) (syntax-bind ((y (.....))) (syntax-if (syntax-atom? x) (syntax-begin (syntax-warning "Atoms may explode if split") (syntax-begin (y (......)) (syntax-begin (syntax-debug-message "y = " y) (syntax-bind (z (.......)) . . This is arguably more Schemely, but it is a royal pain to add debug messages this way....