Date Index - March 2004 - srfi-53@srfi.schemers.org

18 Mar 2004 23:20 UTC	Initial comments & questions	campbell@xxxxxx
19 Mar 2004 00:59 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	campbell@xxxxxx
20 Mar 2004 03:06 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Andre van Tonder
20 Mar 2004 07:31 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Ken Dickey
21 Mar 2004 13:28 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Andre van Tonder
21 Mar 2004 14:09 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Andre van Tonder
21 Mar 2004 15:22 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Ken Dickey
22 Mar 2004 18:00 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Andre van Tonder
23 Mar 2004 03:21 UTC	isn't computation-rules redundant?	Alex Shinn
23 Mar 2004 06:35 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Ken Dickey
23 Mar 2004 12:04 UTC	Re: isn't computation-rules redundant?	Andre van Tonder
23 Mar 2004 17:40 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	campbell@xxxxxx
23 Mar 2004 17:44 UTC	Re: isn't computation-rules redundant?	campbell@xxxxxx
23 Mar 2004 18:00 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	campbell@xxxxxx
23 Mar 2004 19:19 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Bradd W. Szonye
23 Mar 2004 22:11 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Michael Sperber
23 Mar 2004 23:06 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	campbell@xxxxxx
24 Mar 2004 01:49 UTC	Re: isn't computation-rules redundant?	Alex Shinn
25 Mar 2004 20:32 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Andre van Tonder
25 Mar 2004 20:55 UTC	Re: isn't computation-rules redundant?	campbell@xxxxxx
25 Mar 2004 20:58 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	campbell@xxxxxx
25 Mar 2004 21:15 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Andre van Tonder
26 Mar 2004 01:26 UTC	Re: isn't computation-rules redundant?	Alex Shinn
26 Mar 2004 02:09 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Alex Shinn
26 Mar 2004 02:54 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Andre van Tonder
26 Mar 2004 03:24 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Alex Shinn
26 Mar 2004 05:22 UTC	Re: isn't computation-rules redundant?	Alex Shinn
26 Mar 2004 15:41 UTC	Re: isn't computation-rules redundant?	Andre van Tonder
26 Mar 2004 23:20 UTC	Re: isn't computation-rules redundant?	campbell@xxxxxx
26 Mar 2004 23:43 UTC	Request for potential addition	campbell@xxxxxx
27 Mar 2004 02:07 UTC	Re: isn't computation-rules redundant?	Andre van Tonder
27 Mar 2004 02:23 UTC	Re: Request for potential addition	Andre van Tonder
28 Mar 2004 04:18 UTC	Re: isn't computation-rules redundant?	Alex Shinn
31 Mar 2004 07:29 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Alex Shinn
31 Mar 2004 08:33 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Alex Shinn
31 Mar 2004 19:14 UTC	Re: Initial comments & questions	Andre van Tonder