|
binary vs non-binary ports
Per Bothner
(16 Sep 2004 04:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Alex Shinn
(16 Sep 2004 05:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Per Bothner
(16 Sep 2004 06:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Alex Shinn
(16 Sep 2004 07:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Shiro Kawai
(16 Sep 2004 08:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Alex Shinn
(17 Sep 2004 03:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Alex Shinn
(17 Sep 2004 05:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Per Bothner
(17 Sep 2004 17:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Shiro Kawai
(17 Sep 2004 20:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Hans Oesterholt-Dijkema
(17 Sep 2004 21:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Alex Shinn
(18 Sep 2004 02:15 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Per Bothner
(18 Sep 2004 16:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Bradd W. Szonye
(18 Sep 2004 17:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Per Bothner
(18 Sep 2004 19:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Hans Oesterholt-Dijkema
(18 Sep 2004 18:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports Bradd W. Szonye (18 Sep 2004 19:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Alex Shinn
(20 Sep 2004 02:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Per Bothner
(20 Sep 2004 02:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Alex Shinn
(18 Sep 2004 02:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Per Bothner
(18 Sep 2004 20:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Hans Oesterholt-Dijkema
(17 Sep 2004 21:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Hans Oesterholt-Dijkema
(17 Sep 2004 22:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Hans Oesterholt-Dijkema
(17 Sep 2004 22:48 UTC)
|
Hans Oesterholt-Dijkema wrote: > Could be, but that still leaves the trouble of decoding up to 6 byte > UTF8 encodings. Note that UTF-8 characters are never more than 4 bytes long. While the encoding would hypothetically use 6 bytes for a 32-bit character, Unicode characters are never more than 21 bits wide. -- Bradd W. Szonye http://www.szonye.com/bradd
