binary vs non-binary ports
Per Bothner
(16 Sep 2004 04:51 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Alex Shinn
(16 Sep 2004 05:34 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Per Bothner
(16 Sep 2004 06:54 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Alex Shinn
(16 Sep 2004 07:26 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Shiro Kawai
(16 Sep 2004 08:30 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Alex Shinn
(17 Sep 2004 03:43 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Alex Shinn
(17 Sep 2004 05:32 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Per Bothner
(17 Sep 2004 17:22 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Shiro Kawai
(17 Sep 2004 20:44 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Hans Oesterholt-Dijkema
(17 Sep 2004 21:26 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Alex Shinn
(18 Sep 2004 02:15 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Per Bothner
(18 Sep 2004 16:31 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Bradd W. Szonye
(18 Sep 2004 17:43 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports Per Bothner (18 Sep 2004 19:51 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Hans Oesterholt-Dijkema
(18 Sep 2004 18:04 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Bradd W. Szonye
(18 Sep 2004 19:21 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Alex Shinn
(20 Sep 2004 02:06 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Per Bothner
(20 Sep 2004 02:46 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Alex Shinn
(18 Sep 2004 02:21 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Per Bothner
(18 Sep 2004 20:04 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Hans Oesterholt-Dijkema
(17 Sep 2004 21:37 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Hans Oesterholt-Dijkema
(17 Sep 2004 22:40 UTC)
|
Re: binary vs non-binary ports
Hans Oesterholt-Dijkema
(17 Sep 2004 22:48 UTC)
|
Bradd W. Szonye wrote: > Per Bothner wrote: > >>Well, yes. The points I'm making are: >>* One layers text i/o on top of binary i/o. > > > Not in general. That's the easiest way to do it on the "all files are > streams of bytes" used by Unix and Windows, but those aren't the only > operating systems in the worlds. Many systems still use record-based > files and other oddities where you usually implement "binary" I/O on top > of the text or record interface to create the illusion of a byte stream. You'd still not layer binary i/o on top of text i/o. You can layer binary i/o on top of record i/o. -- --Per Bothner xxxxxx@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/