SRFI 56 Binary I/O bear (17 Jun 2004 00:44 UTC)
Re: SRFI 56 Binary I/O Alex Shinn (17 Jun 2004 02:40 UTC)
Re: SRFI 56 Binary I/O tb@xxxxxx (17 Jun 2004 06:14 UTC)
Re: SRFI 56 Binary I/O bear (17 Jun 2004 09:06 UTC)
Re: SRFI 56 Binary I/O Alex Shinn (17 Jun 2004 10:17 UTC)
Re: SRFI 56 Binary I/O Shiro Kawai (17 Jun 2004 10:40 UTC)
Re: SRFI 56 Binary I/O tb@xxxxxx (17 Jun 2004 15:09 UTC)

Re: SRFI 56 Binary I/O tb@xxxxxx 17 Jun 2004 15:09 UTC

Alex Shinn <xxxxxx@synthcode.com> writes:

> The rationale for using byte was largely backwards compatibility.
> Common-Lisp, Gauche, and PLT (as of version 300) all use the above
> names.

Surely true, but the last and only case where we borrow inappropriate
names from Lisp is car and cdr.

Thomas