Andre van Tonder wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
>
>> Andre van Tonder wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
>>>
>>>> From what my experiments show the current SRFI-57 reference
>>>> implementation
>>>> does *not* work on systems that provide a non-generative SRFI-9, or
>>>> non-
>>>> generative native records.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure why that should be.  Would you mind saying a bit more on
>>> this?
>>
>>
>> Here a simple implementation of SRFI-9, using syntax-case:
>>
>> [code snipped]
>
>
> Hi Felix,
>
> The following modification of your code works, but is generative, and so
> probably misses the point of what you were trying to achieve.  To get
> nongenerativity, the underlying SRFI-9-like interface should probably be
> passed an extra identifier to be used as tag, instead of creating a
> unique tag as done below.
>

Thanks, this works, but (as you remark) doesn't help with the generative/
non-generative issue. Well, I'll ponder over this a little more...

cheers,
felix