Update available-- possibly last before finalization
David Van Horn
(08 Dec 2004 20:42 UTC)
|
Re: Update available-- possibly last before finalization
Felix Winkelmann
(09 Dec 2004 06:26 UTC)
|
Re: Update available-- possibly last before finalization
Andre van Tonder
(09 Dec 2004 16:55 UTC)
|
Re: Update available-- possibly last before finalization
Felix Winkelmann
(10 Dec 2004 06:18 UTC)
|
Re: Update available-- possibly last before finalization
Andre van Tonder
(10 Dec 2004 11:47 UTC)
|
Re: Update available-- possibly last before finalization
Felix Winkelmann
(10 Dec 2004 13:03 UTC)
|
Re: Update available-- possibly last before finalization
Andre van Tonder
(10 Dec 2004 18:34 UTC)
|
Re: Update available-- possibly last before finalization Felix Winkelmann (13 Dec 2004 05:50 UTC)
|
Re: Update available-- possibly last before finalization Felix Winkelmann 13 Dec 2004 05:50 UTC
Andre van Tonder wrote: > On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Felix Winkelmann wrote: > >> Andre van Tonder wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Felix Winkelmann wrote: >>> >>>> From what my experiments show the current SRFI-57 reference >>>> implementation >>>> does *not* work on systems that provide a non-generative SRFI-9, or >>>> non- >>>> generative native records. >>> >>> >>> I'm not sure why that should be. Would you mind saying a bit more on >>> this? >> >> >> Here a simple implementation of SRFI-9, using syntax-case: >> >> [code snipped] > > > Hi Felix, > > The following modification of your code works, but is generative, and so > probably misses the point of what you were trying to achieve. To get > nongenerativity, the underlying SRFI-9-like interface should probably be > passed an extra identifier to be used as tag, instead of creating a > unique tag as done below. > Thanks, this works, but (as you remark) doesn't help with the generative/ non-generative issue. Well, I'll ponder over this a little more... cheers, felix