Re: records all have same internal-name Andre van Tonder 20 Dec 2004 18:36 UTC

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Per Bothner wrote:

> Andre van Tonder wrote:
> SFI-9 only defines define-record-type at top-level.  The SRFI-9
> reference implementation is not "declarative" - it maps a
> compile-time-visible define-record-type to calls to a run-time
> functions.  That does not how I want my implementation to be,
> so instead of the referece implmentation I some simple macros
> that translate define-record-type to the Kawa special form
> define-simple-class.

You are right.  The reference implementation depends on a particular
implementation detail of SRFI-9, which was not documented (until now).