|
SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Aubrey Jaffer
(03 Jan 2005 05:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax bear (03 Jan 2005 06:01 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Per Bothner
(03 Jan 2005 06:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Aubrey Jaffer
(03 Jan 2005 19:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Bradd W. Szonye
(04 Jan 2005 22:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Per Bothner
(04 Jan 2005 23:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Bradd W. Szonye
(05 Jan 2005 01:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Per Bothner
(05 Jan 2005 02:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Bradd W. Szonye
(05 Jan 2005 03:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Per Bothner
(05 Jan 2005 03:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Shiro Kawai
(05 Jan 2005 02:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Bradd W. Szonye
(05 Jan 2005 02:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Taylor Campbell
(03 Jan 2005 22:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Bradd W. Szonye
(05 Jan 2005 00:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Matthias Radestock
(05 Jan 2005 01:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Bradd W. Szonye
(05 Jan 2005 02:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Taylor Campbell
(05 Jan 2005 02:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Aubrey Jaffer
(05 Jan 2005 03:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax
Bradd W. Szonye
(05 Jan 2005 03:54 UTC)
|
At this point I have only one question: For a rank-5 array, why #5A(...) instead of #A5(...)? I'm thinking about parsers here, where it's easier on everybody if tokens differ as soon as possible. Bear
