Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax | Simplelists

SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Aubrey Jaffer (03 Jan 2005 05:23 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax bear (03 Jan 2005 06:01 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Per Bothner (03 Jan 2005 06:37 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Aubrey Jaffer (03 Jan 2005 19:16 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Bradd W. Szonye (04 Jan 2005 22:28 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Per Bothner (04 Jan 2005 23:03 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Bradd W. Szonye (05 Jan 2005 01:59 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Per Bothner (05 Jan 2005 02:13 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Bradd W. Szonye (05 Jan 2005 03:08 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Per Bothner (05 Jan 2005 03:39 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Shiro Kawai (05 Jan 2005 02:39 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Bradd W. Szonye (05 Jan 2005 02:48 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Taylor Campbell (03 Jan 2005 22:40 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Bradd W. Szonye (05 Jan 2005 00:07 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Matthias Radestock (05 Jan 2005 01:25 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Bradd W. Szonye (05 Jan 2005 02:41 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Taylor Campbell (05 Jan 2005 02:52 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Aubrey Jaffer (05 Jan 2005 03:25 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax Bradd W. Szonye (05 Jan 2005 03:54 UTC)

Re: SRFI-10 syntax vs. #nA syntax bear 03 Jan 2005 06:00 UTC

At this point I have only one question:  For a rank-5
array, why #5A(...) instead of #A5(...)?

I'm thinking about parsers here, where it's easier on
everybody if tokens differ as soon as possible.

				Bear