Re: nested comments (please correct lexical scope)
Paul Schlie 11 Jan 2005 14:20 UTC
And then finally: (if not to just to close the issue out in my mind):
(#;) :: ({remove }) => ()
To be consistent, although arguably redundant, as an error/warning otherwise
would seem unnecessary. (just as quoting a literal, may also be thought of
as being arguably redundant, but not worthy of an error/warning).
> So wonder if:
>
> {quote } =>
i.e.:
(') :: ({quote }) => ()
As would manifest in :
(' #; <s-exp>) :: ({quote {remove <s-exp>}}) => ()
> As opposed to an otherwise error/warning upon the evaluation of (quote )?
