Re: nested comments (please correct lexical scope) Paul Schlie 11 Jan 2005 14:20 UTC
And then finally: (if not to just to close the issue out in my mind): (#;) :: ({remove }) => () To be consistent, although arguably redundant, as an error/warning otherwise would seem unnecessary. (just as quoting a literal, may also be thought of as being arguably redundant, but not worthy of an error/warning). > So wonder if: > > {quote } => i.e.: (') :: ({quote }) => () As would manifest in : (' #; <s-exp>) :: ({quote {remove <s-exp>}}) => () > As opposed to an otherwise error/warning upon the evaluation of (quote )?