And then finally: (if not to just to close the issue out in my mind):

(#;) :: ({remove }) => ()

To be consistent, although arguably redundant, as an error/warning otherwise
would seem unnecessary. (just as quoting a literal, may also be thought of
as being arguably redundant, but not worthy of an error/warning).

> So wonder if:
>
>  {quote } =>

i.e.:

(') :: ({quote }) => ()

As would manifest in :

(' #; <s-exp>) :: ({quote {remove <s-exp>}}) => ()

> As opposed to an otherwise error/warning upon the evaluation of (quote )?