Formal spec; implementation; nesting Alpert Herb Petrofsky (11 Jan 2005 21:03 UTC)
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Bradd W. Szonye (11 Jan 2005 21:19 UTC)
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Paul Schlie (11 Jan 2005 22:29 UTC)
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Taylor Campbell (12 Jan 2005 00:10 UTC)
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Bradd W. Szonye (12 Jan 2005 00:13 UTC)
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Bradd W. Szonye (12 Jan 2005 00:16 UTC)
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Paul Schlie (17 Jan 2005 03:03 UTC)
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Alpine Petrofsky (12 Jan 2005 00:22 UTC)
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Paul Schlie (12 Jan 2005 01:45 UTC)
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Paul Schlie (12 Jan 2005 02:18 UTC)
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Paul Schlie (12 Jan 2005 14:11 UTC)
Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Paul Schlie (12 Jan 2005 14:29 UTC)

Re: Formal spec; implementation; nesting Bradd W. Szonye 12 Jan 2005 00:16 UTC

Regarding the nesting rule: Perhaps it should be an error to write two
#; tokens in a row? It's not something humans are likely to do, and
since the syntax is for human convenience (not for macros) it's not
something likely to come up in a macro transformer. That permits at
least three implementations:

1. Signal an error.
2. Use the "logical" rule favored by current implementations.
3. Use the "intuitive" rule favored by Paul and I.
--
Bradd W. Szonye
http://www.szonye.com/bradd