|
Re: infinities reformulated
Chongkai Zhu
(31 May 2005 07:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
Aubrey Jaffer
(31 May 2005 23:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(02 Jun 2005 15:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
Aubrey Jaffer
(02 Jun 2005 16:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(02 Jun 2005 16:16 UTC)
|
|
string->number
Aubrey Jaffer
(02 Jun 2005 19:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(02 Jun 2005 20:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Aubrey Jaffer
(03 Jun 2005 01:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(03 Jun 2005 02:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Aubrey Jaffer
(15 Jun 2005 21:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(16 Jun 2005 15:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
bear
(16 Jun 2005 16:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: string->number
Aubrey Jaffer
(17 Jun 2005 02:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
bear
(04 Jun 2005 16:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated Aubrey Jaffer (17 Jun 2005 02:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
bear
(19 Jun 2005 17:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
Aubrey Jaffer
(20 Jun 2005 03:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: infinities reformulated
bear
(20 Jun 2005 05:46 UTC)
|
|
precise-numbers
Aubrey Jaffer
(26 Jun 2005 01:50 UTC)
|
| Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:42:21 -0700 (PDT) | From: bear <xxxxxx@sonic.net> | | For heavy math work, I want to be able to specify the precision | used, in one of several ways; For example, by saying | | (with-inexact-precision 128 | ... | (sqrt 2) | ...) | | or | | (sqrt 2 :precision 128) | | or (without keywords) | | (sqrt 2 128) | | or something. Can you give an example of a calculation where you expect that choosing a reduced precision will reap a large benefit?
