Rationale question Michael Sperber 09 Jun 2005 05:57 UTC
A minor point: I'm not sure I follow your Rationale for the
alternative point of view:
> An alternative naming convention for the decomposition operation
> unlist is list->values, which is more symmetric with respect to its
> inverse operation values->list.
I'm not sure what VALUES->LIST is supposed to be---given the symmetry
between return values and arguments, I'd say it'd have to be
(define (values->list . vals)
This procedure is called LIST in R5RS, so LIST-VALUES isn't a name
symmetric with anything. UNLIST seems fine.
Or am I missing something?
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, VÃ¶lkerverstÃ¤ndigung und Ã¼berhaupt blabla