loss of abstraction
Andrew Wilcox
(22 Aug 2005 15:46 UTC)
|
||
Re: loss of abstraction
Michael Sperber
(22 Aug 2005 16:09 UTC)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
Re: loss of abstraction
Andre van Tonder
(23 Aug 2005 15:08 UTC)
|
||
Re: loss of abstraction
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
(23 Aug 2005 15:54 UTC)
|
||
Re: loss of abstraction
Andre van Tonder
(23 Aug 2005 16:19 UTC)
|
||
Re: loss of abstraction Andre van Tonder (23 Aug 2005 15:55 UTC)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
(missing)
|
||
Re: loss of abstraction
bear
(23 Aug 2005 18:37 UTC)
|
Re: loss of abstraction Andre van Tonder 23 Aug 2005 15:55 UTC
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Michael Sperber wrote: > I want to change the representation ot carry location > information, possibly to record if parens or brackets were used, > possibly whether dots appeared in the source code, possibly comments, > and probably all kinds of other stuff in the future. Should I be able to write Scheme code whose meaning depends on page layout, dots, whitespace, or comments? I don't think I ever should. The syntax-as-lists abstraction has the decided advantage of protecting me against these things, which are generally regarded as wrong in the Lisp/Scheme community. Cheers Andre