Unicode surrogates rgburger@xxxxxx (13 Mar 2006 12:11 UTC)
Re: Unicode surrogates Tom Emerson (13 Mar 2006 13:43 UTC)
Re: Unicode surrogates John Cowan (13 Mar 2006 13:56 UTC)
Re: Unicode surrogates Robby Findler (13 Mar 2006 14:03 UTC)
Re: Unicode surrogates bear (13 Mar 2006 17:04 UTC)
Re: Unicode surrogates Per Bothner (13 Mar 2006 17:13 UTC)
Re: Unicode surrogates bear (22 Mar 2006 23:52 UTC)
Re: Unicode surrogates Tom Emerson (13 Mar 2006 17:16 UTC)

Re: Unicode surrogates Per Bothner 13 Mar 2006 17:13 UTC

bear wrote:
> To put it another way, Windows allows characters that are not part
> of Unicode to be used to name files.  If we restrict our character
> set for filenames to Unicode-only, we will not be able to open
> those files.  That problem is real.

That does not mean it's a problem we need to solve.

If you make it use to create filenames containing unpaired surrogates,
that just means you make it easy to files with garbage filenames.
I don't see that as a feature.  Any such filenames are presumably
unintentional and due to bugs.  We don't need a standard Scheme API
for dealing with those bugs, just like we don't need a standard Scheme
API for editing the registry.
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/