case mappings
Alex Shinn
(13 Jul 2005 03:57 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Jul 2005 05:49 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Michael Sperber
(13 Jul 2005 06:41 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Jul 2005 06:47 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Michael Sperber
(13 Jul 2005 07:12 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Jul 2005 07:21 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
bear
(13 Jul 2005 17:24 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Jul 2005 19:35 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Alex Shinn
(13 Jul 2005 07:55 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Alex Shinn
(13 Jul 2005 07:40 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Jul 2005 19:36 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Alex Shinn
(14 Jul 2005 02:39 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(14 Jul 2005 07:15 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Alex Shinn
(14 Jul 2005 07:42 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(14 Jul 2005 08:07 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings Alex Shinn (14 Jul 2005 08:24 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
bear
(14 Jul 2005 16:47 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(14 Jul 2005 20:29 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
bear
(15 Jul 2005 18:23 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(15 Jul 2005 19:52 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Matthew Flatt
(13 Jul 2005 13:05 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Thomas Bushnell BSG
(13 Jul 2005 19:39 UTC)
|
Re: case mappings
Alex Shinn
(14 Jul 2005 02:31 UTC)
|
On 7/14/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG <xxxxxx@becket.net> wrote: > > An incoming email message is not a series of characters. You are absolutely correct. However this is difficult to discuss without knowledge of the binary I/O API. -- Alex