Date Index - September 2005 - srfi-76@srfi.schemers.org

13 Sep 2005 14:07 UTC	Just provide procedural interface	Andre van Tonder
13 Sep 2005 16:17 UTC	"types" or "records"?	Donovan Kolbly
13 Sep 2005 16:32 UTC	Why Single Inheritance Restriction?	Ken Dickey
13 Sep 2005 21:35 UTC	Re: Just provide procedural interface	Per Bothner
13 Sep 2005 21:38 UTC	Problem with type inference	Andre van Tonder
13 Sep 2005 21:44 UTC	Re: Just provide procedural interface	Andre van Tonder
14 Sep 2005 07:43 UTC	records with additional indexed fields	Sebastian Egner
14 Sep 2005 11:35 UTC	Problems with field initialization	Andre van Tonder
14 Sep 2005 12:56 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization	Andre van Tonder
14 Sep 2005 19:15 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization	Michael Sperber
14 Sep 2005 19:18 UTC	Re: "types" or "records"?	Taylor Campbell
14 Sep 2005 19:26 UTC	Re: "types" or "records"?	Michael Sperber
14 Sep 2005 21:04 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization	Andre van Tonder
15 Sep 2005 16:34 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal	Andre van Tonder
15 Sep 2005 18:14 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal	Michael Sperber
15 Sep 2005 18:15 UTC	Re: Problem with type inference	William D Clinger
15 Sep 2005 20:03 UTC	Re: Problem with type inference	Andre van Tonder
15 Sep 2005 20:41 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal	Andre van Tonder
15 Sep 2005 20:52 UTC	Re: Problem with type inference	Andre van Tonder
16 Sep 2005 07:11 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal	Michael Sperber
16 Sep 2005 07:12 UTC	Re: Problem with type inference	William D Clinger
16 Sep 2005 12:56 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal	Andre van Tonder
16 Sep 2005 15:23 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal	Andre van Tonder
16 Sep 2005 17:12 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal	Michael Sperber
16 Sep 2005 17:14 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal	Michael Sperber
16 Sep 2005 18:16 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal	Andre van Tonder
16 Sep 2005 18:17 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal	Andre van Tonder
16 Sep 2005 18:21 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal	Andre van Tonder
16 Sep 2005 23:41 UTC	Re: field initialization: Backward compatible suggestion	Andre van Tonder
18 Sep 2005 14:07 UTC	Re: Why Single Inheritance Restriction?	Richard Kelsey
18 Sep 2005 14:33 UTC	opaque record types	Richard Kelsey
19 Sep 2005 14:01 UTC	Incompatibility with pattern matching	Andre van Tonder
19 Sep 2005 16:28 UTC	Constructor rationale questions	Andre van Tonder
20 Sep 2005 10:05 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal	Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 10:07 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal	Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 10:21 UTC	Re: Why Single Inheritance Restriction?	Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 10:34 UTC	Re: opaque record types	Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 10:36 UTC	Re: Incompatibility with pattern matching	Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 10:39 UTC	Re: Constructor rationale questions	Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 12:01 UTC	Re: Incompatibility with pattern matching	Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
20 Sep 2005 14:29 UTC	Re: Why Single Inheritance Restriction?	Richard Kelsey
20 Sep 2005 15:15 UTC	Re: Why Single Inheritance Restriction?	Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 15:17 UTC	Re: opaque record types	Richard Kelsey
20 Sep 2005 15:27 UTC	Re: Why Single Inheritance Restriction?	Richard Kelsey
20 Sep 2005 15:40 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal	Andre van Tonder
20 Sep 2005 15:46 UTC	Re: Incompatibility with pattern matching	Andre van Tonder
20 Sep 2005 15:53 UTC	Re: Why Single Inheritance Restriction?	Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 15:57 UTC	Re: Constructor rationale questions	Andre van Tonder
20 Sep 2005 16:01 UTC	Re: opaque record types	Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 16:04 UTC	Re: Incompatibility with pattern matching	Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 16:11 UTC	Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal	Andre van Tonder
20 Sep 2005 16:22 UTC	Re: Constructor rationale questions	Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 16:24 UTC	Re: Why Single Inheritance Restriction?	Andre van Tonder
20 Sep 2005 16:46 UTC	Re: Constructor rationale questions	Andre van Tonder
20 Sep 2005 20:23 UTC	Optional features [was Re: opaque record types]	Donovan Kolbly
21 Sep 2005 06:36 UTC	Re: Optional features	Michael Sperber
22 Sep 2005 15:20 UTC	Miscellaneous loose ends	Andre van Tonder
22 Sep 2005 15:45 UTC	Re: Miscellaneous loose ends	Andre van Tonder