Date Index - September 2005 - srfi-76@srfi.schemers.org

13 Sep 2005 14:07 UTC Just provide procedural interface Andre van Tonder
13 Sep 2005 16:17 UTC "types" or "records"? Donovan Kolbly
13 Sep 2005 16:32 UTC Why Single Inheritance Restriction? Ken Dickey
13 Sep 2005 21:35 UTC Re: Just provide procedural interface Per Bothner
13 Sep 2005 21:38 UTC Problem with type inference Andre van Tonder
13 Sep 2005 21:44 UTC Re: Just provide procedural interface Andre van Tonder
14 Sep 2005 07:43 UTC records with additional indexed fields Sebastian Egner
14 Sep 2005 11:35 UTC Problems with field initialization Andre van Tonder
14 Sep 2005 12:56 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization Andre van Tonder
14 Sep 2005 19:15 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization Michael Sperber
14 Sep 2005 19:18 UTC Re: "types" or "records"? Taylor Campbell
14 Sep 2005 19:26 UTC Re: "types" or "records"? Michael Sperber
14 Sep 2005 21:04 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization Andre van Tonder
15 Sep 2005 16:34 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal Andre van Tonder
15 Sep 2005 18:14 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal Michael Sperber
15 Sep 2005 18:15 UTC Re: Problem with type inference William D Clinger
15 Sep 2005 20:03 UTC Re: Problem with type inference Andre van Tonder
15 Sep 2005 20:41 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal Andre van Tonder
15 Sep 2005 20:52 UTC Re: Problem with type inference Andre van Tonder
16 Sep 2005 07:11 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal Michael Sperber
16 Sep 2005 07:12 UTC Re: Problem with type inference William D Clinger
16 Sep 2005 12:56 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal Andre van Tonder
16 Sep 2005 15:23 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal Andre van Tonder
16 Sep 2005 17:12 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal Michael Sperber
16 Sep 2005 17:14 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal Michael Sperber
16 Sep 2005 18:16 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal Andre van Tonder
16 Sep 2005 18:17 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal Andre van Tonder
16 Sep 2005 18:21 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal Andre van Tonder
16 Sep 2005 23:41 UTC Re: field initialization: Backward compatible suggestion Andre van Tonder
18 Sep 2005 14:07 UTC Re: Why Single Inheritance Restriction? Richard Kelsey
18 Sep 2005 14:33 UTC opaque record types Richard Kelsey
19 Sep 2005 14:01 UTC Incompatibility with pattern matching Andre van Tonder
19 Sep 2005 16:28 UTC Constructor rationale questions Andre van Tonder
20 Sep 2005 10:05 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 10:07 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 10:21 UTC Re: Why Single Inheritance Restriction? Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 10:34 UTC Re: opaque record types Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 10:36 UTC Re: Incompatibility with pattern matching Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 10:39 UTC Re: Constructor rationale questions Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 12:01 UTC Re: Incompatibility with pattern matching Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
20 Sep 2005 14:29 UTC Re: Why Single Inheritance Restriction? Richard Kelsey
20 Sep 2005 15:15 UTC Re: Why Single Inheritance Restriction? Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 15:17 UTC Re: opaque record types Richard Kelsey
20 Sep 2005 15:27 UTC Re: Why Single Inheritance Restriction? Richard Kelsey
20 Sep 2005 15:40 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal Andre van Tonder
20 Sep 2005 15:46 UTC Re: Incompatibility with pattern matching Andre van Tonder
20 Sep 2005 15:53 UTC Re: Why Single Inheritance Restriction? Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 15:57 UTC Re: Constructor rationale questions Andre van Tonder
20 Sep 2005 16:01 UTC Re: opaque record types Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 16:04 UTC Re: Incompatibility with pattern matching Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 16:11 UTC Re: Problems with field initialization: Proposal Andre van Tonder
20 Sep 2005 16:22 UTC Re: Constructor rationale questions Michael Sperber
20 Sep 2005 16:24 UTC Re: Why Single Inheritance Restriction? Andre van Tonder
20 Sep 2005 16:46 UTC Re: Constructor rationale questions Andre van Tonder
20 Sep 2005 20:23 UTC Optional features [was Re: opaque record types] Donovan Kolbly
21 Sep 2005 06:36 UTC Re: Optional features Michael Sperber
22 Sep 2005 15:20 UTC Miscellaneous loose ends Andre van Tonder
22 Sep 2005 15:45 UTC Re: Miscellaneous loose ends Andre van Tonder