Group Email Manager

login signup

Date Index - January 2006 - srfi-76@srfi.schemers.org

02 Jan 2006 14:53 UTC Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft Donovan Kolbly
02 Jan 2006 16:28 UTC Re: Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft Taylor Campbell
03 Jan 2006 07:32 UTC Accessor visibility Andre van Tonder
03 Jan 2006 16:59 UTC Re: Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft Michael Sperber
03 Jan 2006 17:01 UTC Re: Accessor visibility Michael Sperber
03 Jan 2006 18:29 UTC Re: Accessor visibility Andre van Tonder
03 Jan 2006 19:28 UTC Distinct fields Andre van Tonder
03 Jan 2006 20:38 UTC Dead link to Pavel Curtis's 1989 proposal Per Bothner
03 Jan 2006 20:48 UTC record-mutator vs record-modifier Per Bothner
03 Jan 2006 21:00 UTC Re: Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft Taylor Campbell
03 Jan 2006 21:05 UTC Re: Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft Per Bothner
04 Jan 2006 07:44 UTC Eq? issue Andre van Tonder
04 Jan 2006 18:19 UTC Re: Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft Michael Sperber
04 Jan 2006 20:33 UTC Re: record-mutator vs record-modifier Michael Sperber
04 Jan 2006 21:46 UTC Re: record-mutator vs record-modifier Taylor Campbell
05 Jan 2006 18:36 UTC Re: Distinct fields Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2006 18:40 UTC Re: Dead link to Pavel Curtis's 1989 proposal Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2006 18:46 UTC Re: Eq? issue Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2006 01:12 UTC Re: Dead link to Pavel Curtis's 1989 proposal Per Bothner
06 Jan 2006 15:13 UTC Re: Eq? issue Andre van Tonder
07 Jan 2006 00:11 UTC Re: Eq? issue Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
07 Jan 2006 01:12 UTC Re: Eq? issue Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
07 Jan 2006 10:29 UTC Opacity considered harmful [was Re: Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft] Tony Garnock-Jones
07 Jan 2006 16:31 UTC Re: Opacity considered harmful Andrew Wilcox
07 Jan 2006 23:10 UTC Re: Opacity considered harmful [was Re: Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft] felix winkelmann
07 Jan 2006 23:26 UTC Re: Opacity considered harmful Taylor Campbell
07 Jan 2006 23:39 UTC Re: Opacity considered harmful Per Bothner
08 Jan 2006 10:30 UTC Re: Opacity considered harmful Michael Sperber
08 Jan 2006 14:27 UTC Re: Eq? issue Michael Sperber
08 Jan 2006 14:35 UTC Re: Opacity considered harmful Tony Garnock-Jones
08 Jan 2006 18:22 UTC Re: Opacity considered harmful Taylor Campbell
08 Jan 2006 20:08 UTC Re: Eq? issue Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
10 Jan 2006 18:12 UTC Need to avoid breaking abstractions? Then *DON'T*. bear
10 Jan 2006 18:23 UTC Re: Opacity considered harmful bear