Date Index - January 2006 - srfi-76@srfi.schemers.org

02 Jan 2006 14:53 UTC	Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft	Donovan Kolbly
02 Jan 2006 16:28 UTC	Re: Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft	Taylor Campbell
03 Jan 2006 07:32 UTC	Accessor visibility	Andre van Tonder
03 Jan 2006 16:59 UTC	Re: Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft	Michael Sperber
03 Jan 2006 17:01 UTC	Re: Accessor visibility	Michael Sperber
03 Jan 2006 18:29 UTC	Re: Accessor visibility	Andre van Tonder
03 Jan 2006 19:28 UTC	Distinct fields	Andre van Tonder
03 Jan 2006 20:38 UTC	Dead link to Pavel Curtis's 1989 proposal	Per Bothner
03 Jan 2006 20:48 UTC	record-mutator vs record-modifier	Per Bothner
03 Jan 2006 21:00 UTC	Re: Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft	Taylor Campbell
03 Jan 2006 21:05 UTC	Re: Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft	Per Bothner
04 Jan 2006 07:44 UTC	Eq? issue	Andre van Tonder
04 Jan 2006 18:19 UTC	Re: Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft	Michael Sperber
04 Jan 2006 20:33 UTC	Re: record-mutator vs record-modifier	Michael Sperber
04 Jan 2006 21:46 UTC	Re: record-mutator vs record-modifier	Taylor Campbell
05 Jan 2006 18:36 UTC	Re: Distinct fields	Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2006 18:40 UTC	Re: Dead link to Pavel Curtis's 1989 proposal	Michael Sperber
05 Jan 2006 18:46 UTC	Re: Eq? issue	Michael Sperber
06 Jan 2006 01:12 UTC	Re: Dead link to Pavel Curtis's 1989 proposal	Per Bothner
06 Jan 2006 15:13 UTC	Re: Eq? issue	Andre van Tonder
07 Jan 2006 00:11 UTC	Re: Eq? issue	Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
07 Jan 2006 01:12 UTC	Re: Eq? issue	Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
07 Jan 2006 10:29 UTC	Opacity considered harmful [was Re: Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft]	Tony Garnock-Jones
07 Jan 2006 16:31 UTC	Re: Opacity considered harmful	Andrew Wilcox
07 Jan 2006 23:10 UTC	Re: Opacity considered harmful [was Re: Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft]	felix winkelmann
07 Jan 2006 23:26 UTC	Re: Opacity considered harmful	Taylor Campbell
07 Jan 2006 23:39 UTC	Re: Opacity considered harmful	Per Bothner
08 Jan 2006 10:30 UTC	Re: Opacity considered harmful	Michael Sperber
08 Jan 2006 14:27 UTC	Re: Eq? issue	Michael Sperber
08 Jan 2006 14:35 UTC	Re: Opacity considered harmful	Tony Garnock-Jones
08 Jan 2006 18:22 UTC	Re: Opacity considered harmful	Taylor Campbell
08 Jan 2006 20:08 UTC	Re: Eq? issue	Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
10 Jan 2006 18:12 UTC	Need to avoid breaking abstractions? Then DON'T.	bear
10 Jan 2006 18:23 UTC	Re: Opacity considered harmful	bear